Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34693139›Full record

ArticleACS omega2021

Evaporation-Based Low-Cost Method for the Detection of Adulterant in Milk.

Virkeshwar Kumar, Susmita Dash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Virkeshwar KumarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, Bengaluru 560012, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6324-5679
Susmita DashDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, Bengaluru 560012, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0952-4209

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adulteration of milk poses a severe health hazard, and it is crucial to develop adulterant-detection techniques that are scalable and easy to use. Water and urea are two of the most common adulterants in commercial milk. Detection of these adulterants is both challenging and costly in urban and rural areas. Here we report on an evaporation-based low-cost technique for the detection of added water and urea in milk. The evaporative deposition is shown to be affected by the presence of adulterants in milk. We observe a specific pattern formation of nonvolatile milk solids deposited at the end of the evaporation of a droplet of unadulterated milk. These patterns alter with the addition of water and urea. The evaporative deposits are dependent on the concentrations of water and urea added. The sensitivity of detection of urea in milk improves with the dilution of milk with water. We show that our method can be used to detect a urea concentration as low as 0.4% in milk. Based on the detection level of urea, we present a regime map that shows the concentration of urea that can be detected at different extents of dilution of milk.

Identifiers

PMID34693139
PMCPMC8529649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.