Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34693062›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2021

High-throughput molecular technologies for unraveling the mystery of soil microbial community: challenges and future prospects.

Rachid Lahlali, Dina S S Ibrahim, Zineb Belabess, Md Zohurul Kadir Roni, Nabil Radouane, Cláudia S L Vicente, Esther Menéndez, Fouad Mokrini, Essaid Ait Barka, Manuel Galvão de Melo E Mota and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rachid LahlaliPlant Pathology Unit, Department of Plant Protection, Ecole Nationale d'Agriculture de Meknes, BP S/40, 50001, Meknes, Morocco.
Dina S S IbrahimDepartment of Nematodes Diseases and Central Lab of Biotechnology, Plant Pathology Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), 12619, Egypt.
Zineb BelabessPlant Protection Laboratory. Regional Center of Agricultural Research of Oujda, National Institute of Agricultural Research, Avenue Mohamed VI, BP428 60000 Oujda, Morocco.
Md Zohurul Kadir RoniTropical Agriculture Research Front, Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS), 1091-1 Maezato-Kawarabaru, Ishigaki, Okinawa, 907-0002, Japan.
Nabil RadouanePlant Pathology Unit, Department of Plant Protection, Ecole Nationale d'Agriculture de Meknes, BP S/40, 50001, Meknes, Morocco.
Cláudia S L VicenteMED - Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, Institute for Advanced Studies and Research (IIFA), Universidade de Évora, Pólo da Mitra, Ap. 94, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal.
Esther MenéndezINIAV, I.P. - Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária, Quinta do Marquês, 2780-159 Oeiras, Portugal.
Fouad MokriniPlant Protection Laboratory, INRA, Centre Régional de la Recherche Agronomique (CRRA), Rabat, Morocco.
Essaid Ait BarkaUnité de Recherche Résistance Induite et Bio-protection des Plantes, EA 4707, USC, INRAe1488, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, France.
Manuel Galvão de Melo E MotaNemaLab, MED - Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development & Department of Biology, Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade de Évora, Pólo da Mitra, Ap. 94, 7006-554 Évora, Portugal.
Gary PengSaskatoon Research Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food, Saskatchewan, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil microbial communities play a crucial role in soil fertility, sustainability, and plant health. However, intensive agriculture with increasing chemical inputs and changing environments have influenced native soil microbial communities. Approaches have been developed to study the structure, diversity, and activity of soil microbes to better understand the biology and plant-microbe interactions in soils. Unfortunately, a good understanding of soil microbial community remains a challenge due to the complexity of community composition, interactions of the soil environment, and limitations of technologies, especially related to the functionality of some taxa rarely detected using conventional techniques. Culture-based methods have been shown unable and sometimes are biased for assessing soil microbial communities. To gain further knowledge, culture-independent methods relying on direct analysis of nucleic acids, proteins, and lipids are worth exploring. In recent years, metagenomics, metaproteomics, metatranscriptomics, and proteogenomics have been increasingly used in studying microbial ecology. In this review, we examined the importance of microbial community to soil quality, the mystery of rhizosphere and plant-microbe interactions, and the biodiversity and multi-trophic interactions that influence the soil structure and functionality. The impact of the cropping system and climate change on the soil microbial community was also explored. Importantly, progresses in molecular biology, especially in the development of high-throughput biotechnological tools, were extensively assessed for potential uses to decipher the diversity and dynamics of soil microbial communities, with the highlighted advantages/limitations.

Indexed as

DiversityHigh-throughput screeningOmicsPlant-microbe interactionsRhizosphereSoil

Identifiers

PMID34693062
PMCPMC8515249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.