ArticleReproductive biomedicine & society online2022
Financing future fertility: Women's views on funding egg freezing.
Article in Reproductive biomedicine & society online, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protocol for a multicentre survey of sexual and reproductive health and fertility among unmarried women living in China's megacities.BMJ open · 2026Article
- The new ethical challenges raised by the authorization of elective egg freezing in France since 2021.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Improving access to fertility treatment in Asia Pacific: consensus from an expert forum.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Review
- The Right to Freeze Oocyte for Women in Iranian Fertility Centers: A Qualitative Study.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025Article
- Women Who Perform Social Egg Freezing as Moral Pioneers: The Case of Ultra-Orthodox Communities in Israel.Journal of religion and health · 2024Article
- Balancing choice and socioeconomic realities: analyzing behavioral and economic factors in social oocyte cryopreservation decisions.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- The first nationwide website survey of the availability and costs of medical and non-medical oocyte cryopreservation in Japan.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Outcomes of Social Egg Freezing: A Cohort Study and a Comprehensive Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Too much equity - is there such a thing? The public discourse surrounding elective egg freezing subsidy in Israel.International journal for equity in health · 2023Article
- Medical versus social egg freezing: the importance of future choice for women's decision-making.Monash bioethics review · 2022Article
- Which assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment strategy is the most clinically and cost-effective for women of advanced maternal age: a Markov model.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- 'I feel that injustice is being done to me': a qualitative study of women's viewpoints on the (lack of) reimbursement for social egg freezing.BMC medical ethics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Like other assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures, the cost of egg freezing (EF) is significant, presenting a potential barrier to access. Given recent technological advancements and rising demand for EF, it is timely to reassess how EF is funded. An online cross-sectional survey was conducted in Victoria, Australia and was completed by 656 female individuals. Participants were asked their views on funding for both medical and non-medical EF. The median age of participants was 28 years (interquartile range 23-37 years) and most participants were employed (44% full-time, 28% part-time, 33% students). There was very high support for public funding for medical EF (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.