Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34692856›Full record

ArticleJournal of advances in medical education & professionalism2021

Increasing medical student confidence in gender and sexual health through a student-initiated lecture series.

Jasmin Mahabamunuge, Kayla Morel, John Budrow, Innes Tounkel, Cassidy Hart, Camille Briskin, Madison Kasoff, Sarah Spiegel, Donald Risucci, Jennifer Koestler

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jasmin MahabamunugeNew York Medical College, Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Kayla MorelNew York Medical College, Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Valhalla, NY, USA.
John BudrowNew York Medical College, Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Innes TounkelNew York Medical College, Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Cassidy HartNew York Medical College, Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Camille BriskinNew York Medical College, Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Madison KasoffNew York Medical College, Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Sarah SpiegelNew York Medical College, Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Donald RisucciNew York Medical College, Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Jennifer KoestlerNew York Medical College, Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Valhalla, NY, USA.
New York Medical College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMedical students self-report insufficient training in topics of gender and sexuality in medicine, which may ultimately lead to negative health outcomes in patients for whom they will provide care. This study aims to identify whether a student-initiated lecture series on topics related to gender and sexual health leads to greater student comfort with discussing topics related to diverse sexual content.

methodsMedical students matriculated during two consecutive academic years were invited to participate in the lecture series. Investigators administered anonymous pre- and post-series surveys (n=152 and 105 respondents, respectively) using google forms. Respondents rated their comfort levels discussing relevant topics and provided narrative feedback concerning strengths and areas for improvement of the lecture series. Overlaps between the 95% confidence intervals around pre- and post-series percentage of students comfortable/very comfortable discussing each topic were examined to compare pre- vs post-series comfort ratings. Narrative comments were reviewed for thematic feedback.

results105 medical students completed the lecture series, with 80% identifying as female. Self-assessed comfort levels across all seminar topics were greater in post- versus pre-lecture series surveys with the following topics showing the biggest differences (percentage of students "somewhat" or "very" comfortable [95% confidence intervals]: discussing sexuality with gender (68%[59-77] vs. 29%[22-36]) and sexual minority patients (84%[77-91] vs. 49%[41-57]), HIV prevention counseling (70%[61-78] vs. 20% [20-34]), identifying female genital cutting (44% [34-53] vs. 11%[6-16]), and discussing intimate partner violence (65%[55-74] vs. 33%[25-40]). Qualitative analysis indicated respondents found the lectures to be effective and believed they should be integrated into the required medical school curriculum.

conclusionOur student-initiated lecture series was associated with greater student comfort discussing topics related to gender and sexuality with patients. This framework represents a useful method to address gaps in medical education and has the potential to improve health outcomes in multiple populations.

Indexed as

CurriculumGender and sexual minoritiesGender identityMedical studentsSexual healthSexuality

Identifiers

PMID34692856
PMCPMC8521215
OpenAlexW3201741053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.