Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34692777›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in robotics and AI2021

A Survey for Machine Learning-Based Control of Continuum Robots.

Xiaomei Wang, Yingqi Li, Ka-Wai Kwok

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Model-Free Control of a Soft Pneumatic Segment.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Sensing of Continuum Robots: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Brain-inspired biomimetic robot control: a review.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiaomei WangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, SAR China.
Yingqi LiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, SAR China.
Ka-Wai KwokDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, SAR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soft continuum robots have been accepted as a promising category of biomedical robots, accredited to the robots' inherent compliance that makes them safely interact with their surroundings. In its application of minimally invasive surgery, such a continuum concept shares the same view of robotization for conventional endoscopy/laparoscopy. Different from rigid-link robots with accurate analytical kinematics/dynamics, soft robots encounter modeling uncertainties due to intrinsic and extrinsic factors, which would deteriorate the model-based control performances. However, the trade-off between flexibility and controllability of soft manipulators may not be readily optimized but would be demanded for specific kinds of modeling approaches. To this end, data-driven modeling strategies making use of machine learning algorithms would be an encouraging way out for the control of soft continuum robots. In this article, we attempt to overview the current state of kinematic/dynamic model-free control schemes for continuum manipulators, particularly by learning-based means, and discuss their similarities and differences. Perspectives and trends in the development of new control methods are also investigated through the review of existing limitations and challenges.

Indexed as

continuum robotsdata-driven controlinverse kinematics (IK)kinematic/dynamic model-free controllearning-based controlmachine learningreinforcement learningsoft robots

Identifiers

PMID34692777
PMCPMC8527450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.