Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34692747›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2021

Improving Healthy Food Choices in Low-Income Settings in the United States Using Behavioral Economic-Based Adaptations to Choice Architecture.

Emma Anderson, Ruobin Wei, Binkai Liu, Rachel Plummer, Heather Kelahan, Martha Tamez, Abrania Marrero, Shilpa Bhupathiraju, Josiemer Mattei

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The charitable food system as a change agent.Frontiers in public health · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Online Pilot Grocery Intervention among Rural and Urban Residents Aimed to Improve Purchasing Habits.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emma AndersonDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Ruobin WeiDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Binkai LiuDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Rachel PlummerDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Heather KelahanDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Martha TamezDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Abrania MarreroDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Shilpa BhupathirajuDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Josiemer MatteiDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Harvard University · US

Funding

New York Regional Center for Diabetes Translation Research - Translational Intervention Methodology CoreP30DK111022 · NIDDK · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI JEFFREY GONZALEZ · 2016 to 2026
$7.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK111022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low diet quality is a significant public health problem in the United States, especially among low-income populations. The food environment influences dietary choices. When applied to eating behavior, behavioral economics (BE) recognizes that decision biases instigated by a food environment saturated with unhealthy foods may lead people to purchase such foods, even when they possess the necessary information and skills to make healthy dietary choices. Choice architecture, a BE concept that involves modifying the appeal or availability of choices to "nudge" people toward a certain choice, retains freedom of choice but makes unhealthy options less convenient or visible. Choice architecture has been demonstrated to influence food choices in various settings, including supermarkets, convenience stores, and food pantries. These modifications are low-cost and feasible to implement, making them a viable strategy to help "nudge" patrons toward healthier choices in food establishments serving low-income populations, including food pantries and retailers accepting the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. This narrative review searched, appraised, and underscored the strengths and limitations of extant research studies that used choice architecture adaptations to influence food choices among low-income populations in the United States. Findings from studies in food pantry settings suggest the potential of BE strategies to improve the healthfulness of food choices and dietary intake in low-income populations. In food retail settings, research suggests that BE strategies increase sales of healthy foods, like fruits and vegetables. We identify new areas of research needed to determine if BE-based modifications in low-income settings have sustained impacts on diet quality.

Indexed as

behavioral economicschoice architecturefood choicesfood pantrieslow-income populationsSNAP retailers

Identifiers

PMID34692747
PMCPMC8526839
OpenAlexW3202157029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.