Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34692577›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of otorhinolaryngology2021

Quality of Life with Voice Prosthesis after Total Laryngectomy.

Nicola Massaro, Barbara Verro, Giuseppe Greco, Enzo Chianetta, Aurelio D'Ecclesia, Carmelo Saraniti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of otorhinolaryngology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Oncological Outcomes of Primary vs. Salvage OPHL Type II: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Effect of silver sulfadiazine on mature mixed bacterial biofilms on voice prostheses.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicola MassaroDepartment of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Palermo (PA) Italy.
Barbara VerroDepartment of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Palermo (PA) Italy.
Giuseppe GrecoDepartment of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Palermo (PA) Italy.
Enzo ChianettaDepartment of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Palermo (PA) Italy.
Aurelio D'EcclesiaENT and Maxillo-Facial Clinic, IRCSS - Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza - San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia (FG), Italy.
Carmelo SaranitiDepartment of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Palermo (PA) Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe loss of voice after total laryngectomy is one of the main impairments in personal and social life. In order to prevent potential psycho-social consequences in the patient and his family, the restoration of phonatory function is the main objective of post-laryngectomy rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to assess quality of life in patients who received prosthetic voice after total laryngectomy. MATERIALS AND

methodsOver a one-year period, 51 patients with voice prostheses after total laryngectomy were recruited. 32 patients (62.74%) were administered radiation therapy and 9 patients (17.64%) underwent to surgical reconstruction with flaps. Each patient was administered the VHI-10 and V-RQOL self-assessment questionnaires.

resultsThe study showed that vocal restoration with voice prosthesis allows patients to recover a significant degree of quality of life after total laryngectomy. The average score on the V-RQOL questionnaire was 75.9 and on the VHI-10 questionnaire was 13.5. It has not been shown a statistically significant correlation between quality of life after tracheoesophageal prosthesis and radiation therapy, chemotherapy or reconstruction flaps. Younger patients showed, on average, a higher score at V-RQOL. These results allow to state that, after prosthetic rehabilitation, at least 75% of patients experienced an increase in quality of life. Moreover, the prosthetic technique (primary vs secondary) does not affect the long-term outcome and radiotherapy, chemotherapy or reconstruction flaps are not absolute contraindications to rehabilitation with voice prosthesis.

conclusionAfter total laryngectomy, rehabilitation with tracheoesophageal prosthesis is a satisfactory choice to restore the patient's ability to communicate verbally.

Indexed as

LaryngectomyProsthesesQuality of lifeVoice quality

Identifiers

PMID34692577
PMCPMC8507945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.