Article3 Biotech2021
Genomic insights into biocontrol potential of
Article in 3 Biotech, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Probiotic potential of autochthonous Enterobacter mori ASP8 and Bacillus stercoris ASP10 isolated from gut microbiota of healthy stinging catfish, Heteropneustes fossilis (Bloch).Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Characterization ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Genome-guided antimicrobial potential of Bacillus stercoris from coastal sand with activity against multidrug-resistant bacteria, including MRSA.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026Article
- A novel bacterial symbiont in the seaweedFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Insight into Antifungal Metabolites fromBiomolecules · 2024Article
- Evaluation and Genome Mining of Bacillus stercoris Isolate B.PNR1 as Potential Agent for Fusarium Wilt Control and Growth Promotion of Tomato.The plant pathology journal · 2023Article
- Genome sequence and comparative analysis of fungal antagonistic strain Bacillus velezensis LJBV19.Folia microbiologica · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13205-021-03000-6.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.