Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34692292›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Performance of Health Care Workers in Doffing of Personal Protective Equipment Using Real-Time Remote Audio-Visual Doffing Surveillance System: Its Implications for Bio-Safety Amid COVID-19 Pandemic.

Naveen Naik B, Ajay Singh, Michelle S Lazar, Venkata Ganesh, Shiv L Soni, Manisha Biswal, Karobi Das, Sukhpal Kaur, Goverdhan Puri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. SARS-CoV-2 in lions, gorillas and zookeepers in the Rotterdam Zoo, the Netherlands, a One Health investigation, November 2021.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Naveen Naik BDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IND.
Ajay SinghDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IND.
Michelle S LazarDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IND.
Venkata GaneshDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IND.
Shiv L SoniDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IND.
Manisha BiswalDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IND.
Karobi DasDepartment of Nursing Education, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IND.
Sukhpal KaurDepartment of Nursing Education, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IND.
Goverdhan PuriDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Very little has been reported about health care workers' (HCWs) adherence to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines of doffing personal protective equipment (PPE) amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Real-time remote audio-visual doffing surveillance (RADS) system for assisting doffing might reduce the risk of self-contamination. We used this system to determine the incidence of the breach in biosafety during doffing of PPE among HCWs involved in the care of Covid-19 patients. Methods A total of 100 HCWs were enrolled in this observational study who performed duties in the COVID intensive care unit (ICU) of our tertiary care centre. With a real-time RADS system, trained observers from remote locations assisted HCWs during doffing of PPE and noted breach at any step using the CDC doffing checklist. The breach was considered major if committed during removal of gloves/gown/N-95 or if ≥3 errors occurred in any other steps. Results Overall, 40% of the HCWs committed a breach during doffing at least one step. The majority of the errors were observed during hand hygiene (34%), followed by glove removal (12%) and N-95 removal (8%). Nineteen percent of HCWs committed the major breach, out of which 37.5% were done by house-keeping sanitation staff (p = 0.008 and RR 2.85; 95% CI of 1.313-6.19), followed by technicians (22.5%), nursing staff (16.7%) and resident doctors (6.5%). Conclusions Performing doffing using a real-time RADS system is associated with a relatively low incidence of a breach in biosafety compared with earlier studies using an onsite standard observer. Overall adherence of HCWs to the CDC guidelines of doffing PPE was satisfactory. This study highlights the importance of the RADS system during doffing of PPE in a health care setting amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

biosafetybreachcontaminationcovid-19doffingremote

Identifiers

PMID34692292
PMCPMC8523387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.