Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34692234›Full record

ReviewCurrent dermatology reports2021

Social Media in Dermatology and an Overview of Popular Social Media Platforms.

Mindy D Szeto, Andrina Mamo, Antara Afrin, Michelle Militello, Cara Barber

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current dermatology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Oocyte cryopreservation on TikTok and Instagram: Who is teaching whom?Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mindy D SzetoDepartment of Dermatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA.
Andrina MamoDepartment of Dermatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO USA.
Antara AfrinCollege of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI USA.
Michelle MilitelloCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Rocky Vista University, Parker, CO USA.
Cara BarberDepartment of Dermatology, Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center/Silver Falls Dermatology, Salem, OR USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4207-8634

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewSocial media provides an accessible and increasingly popular avenue for sharing healthcare information, networking, and outreach in dermatology. We provide an overview of prominent social media platforms, also known as applications or apps, as well as a discussion of their influence and implications for the field. RECENT

findingsThe various collaborative features of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, Snapchat, and other emerging platforms have proven appealing to organizations and users seeking dermatology-related content and medical advice. However, the potential for propagation of inaccurate or even dangerous information is high. SUMMARY: Despite the risks associated with social media usage, dermatology can benefit from opportunities to connect and engage with audiences through these platforms. Dermatologists should be encouraged to increase their presence on multiple social media apps to dispel and counteract misleading posts with evidence-based knowledge.

Indexed as

FacebookInstagramSocial media applicationsTikTokTwitterYouTube

Identifiers

PMID34692234
PMCPMC8525049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.