Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34692207›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2021

Machine learning-based rapid diagnosis of human borderline ovarian cancer on second-harmonic generation images.

Guangxing Wang, Yang Sun, Shuisen Jiang, Guizhu Wu, Wenliang Liao, Yuwei Chen, Zexi Lin, Zhiyi Liu, Shuangmu Zhuo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Use and application of organ-on-a-chip platforms in cancer research.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Organ on Chip Technology to Model Cancer Growth and Metastasis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Guangxing WangSchool of Science, Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, China.
Yang SunDepartment of Gynecology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, China.
Shuisen JiangSchool of Science, Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1575-4919
Guizhu WuShanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200030, China.
Wenliang LiaoSchool of Science, Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, China.
Yuwei ChenDepartment of Gynecology, Fujian Medical University Cancer Hospital, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou 350014, China.
Zexi LinKey Laboratory of OptoElectronic Science and Technology for Medicine of the Ministry of Education & Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Photonics Technology, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, 350007, China.
Zhiyi LiuState Key Laboratory of Modern Optical Instrumentation, College of Optical Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Shuangmu ZhuoSchool of Science, Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regarding growth pattern and cytological characteristics, borderline ovarian tumors fall between benign and malignant, but they tend to develop malignancy. Currently, it is difficult to accurately diagnose ovarian cancer using common medical imaging methods, and histopathological examination is routinely used to obtain a definitive diagnosis. However, such examination requires experienced pathologists, being labor-intensive, time-consuming, and possibly leading to interobserver bias. By using second-harmonic generation imaging and k-nearest neighbors classifier in conjunction with automated machine learning tree-based pipeline optimization tool, we developed a computer-aided diagnosis method to classify ovarian tissues as being malignant, benign, borderline, and normal, obtaining areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 1.00, 0.99, 0.98, and 0.97, respectively. These results suggest that diagnosis based on second-harmonic generation images and machine learning can support the rapid and accurate detection of ovarian cancer in clinical practice.

Identifiers

PMID34692207
PMCPMC8515988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.