Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34691764›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Materials2022

A framework for developing sex-specific engineered heart models.

Roberta Lock, Hadel Al Asafen, Sharon Fleischer, Manuel Tamargo, Yimu Zhao, Milica Radisic, Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Materials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Estrogen elicits ferroptosis-related myocardial oxidative stress and dysfunction in male rats.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2025
    Article
  4. Toward Sex-Specific Biomaterials Innovation: A Perspective.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Developing sex-accurate cell culture environments.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Sex differences in radiation research.International journal of radiation biology · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Roberta LockDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY USA.
Hadel Al AsafenInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada.
Sharon FleischerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY USA.
Manuel TamargoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY USA.
Yimu ZhaoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY USA.
Milica RadisicInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1249-4135
Gordana Vunjak-NovakovicDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9382-1574

Funding

Tissue Engineering Resource Center: TTDP41EB027062 · NIBIB · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic · 2019 to 2026
$12.6M
Engineering Vascularized Cardiac MuscleR01HL076485 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic · 2005 to 2026
$9.2M
Multi-tissue platform for modeling systemic pathologiesUH3EB025765 · NIBIB · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI VUNJAK-NOVAKOVIC, GORDANA · 2019 to 2021
$4.0M
Multi-tissue platform for modeling systemic pathologiesUG3EB025765 · NIBIB · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI VUNJAK-NOVAKOVIC, GORDANA · 2017 to 2019
$2.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL076485NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB027062NIBIB NIH HHS UG3 EB025765NIBIB NIH HHS UH3 EB025765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The convergence of tissue engineering and patient-specific stem cell biology has enabled the engineering of in vitro tissue models that allow the study of patient-tailored treatment modalities. However, sex-related disparities in health and disease, from systemic hormonal influences to cellular-level differences, are often overlooked in stem cell biology, tissue engineering and preclinical screening. The cardiovascular system, in particular, shows considerable sex-related differences, which need to be considered in cardiac tissue engineering. In this Review, we analyse sex-related properties of the heart muscle in the context of health and disease, and discuss a framework for including sex-based differences in human cardiac tissue engineering. We highlight how sex-based features can be implemented at the cellular and tissue levels, and how sex-specific cardiac models could advance the study of cardiovascular diseases. Finally, we define design criteria for sex-specific cardiac tissue engineering and provide an outlook to future research possibilities beyond the cardiovascular system.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular diseases

Identifiers

PMID34691764
PMCPMC8527305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.