ArticleNational science review2020
Disruption of splicing-regulatory elements using CRISPR/Cas9 to rescue spinal muscular atrophy in human iPSCs and mice.
Article in National science review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- CRISPR-Cas9 Therapeutics in Early Clinical Development: Delivery and Molecular Diagnostics.Cells · 2026Review
- Spinal muscular atrophy in the disease-modifying therapy era: successes, limitations and future directions.Frontiers in molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Genetically engineered approaches to the treatment of cystic fibrosis.Biophysical reviews · 2025Review
- Treating neuromuscular diseases: unveiling gene therapy breakthroughs and pioneering future applications.Journal of biomedical science · 2025Review
- Optimization of base editors for the functional correction of SMN2 as a treatment for spinal muscular atrophy.Nature biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Emerging Gene Therapy Approaches in the Management of Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA): An Overview of Clinical Trials and Patent Landscape.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Base editing rescue of spinal muscular atrophy in cells and in mice.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Stem Cell-Based Therapeutic Approaches in Genetic Diseases.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Article
- CRISPR and iPSCs: Recent Developments and Future Perspectives in Neurodegenerative Disease Modelling, Research, and Therapeutics.Neurotoxicity research · 2022Review
- Targeted-Deletion of a Tiny Sequence via Prime Editing to Restore SMN Expression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Advances in gene therapy for neurogenetic diseases: a brief review.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2022Review
- Novel genome-editing-based approaches to treat motor neuron diseases: Promises and challenges.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2022Review
- Novel Intronic Mutations ofFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022Article
- Emerging strategies for the genetic dissection of gene functions, cell types, and neural circuits in the mammalian brain.Molecular psychiatry · 2022Review
- History of development of the life-saving drug "Nusinersen" in spinal muscular atrophy.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022Review
- What Genetics Has Told Us and How It Can Inform Future Experiments for Spinal Muscular Atrophy, a Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Stem Cell Models and Gene Targeting for Human Motor Neuron Diseases.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Targeting Alternative Splicing as a Potential Therapy for Episodic Ataxia Type 2.Biomedicines · 2020Review
- CRISPR/Cas: a potential gene-editing tool in the nervous system.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2020Review
- Gene Therapy for Cystic Fibrosis: Progress and Challenges of Genome Editing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
We here report a genome-editing strategy to correct spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Rather than directly targeting the pathogenic exonic mutations, our strategy employed Cas9 and guide-sgRNA for the targeted disruption of intronic splicing-regulatory elements. We disrupted intronic splicing silencers (ISSs, including ISS-N1 and ISS + 100) of survival motor neuron (SMN) 2, a key modifier gene of SMA, to enhance exon 7 inclusion and full-length SMN expression in SMA iPSCs. Survival of splicing-corrected iPSC-derived motor neurons was rescued with SMN restoration. Furthermore, co-injection of Cas9 mRNA from
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.