Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34691315›Full record

ArticleCanadian respiratory journal2021

Role of the Emphysema Index Combined with the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test Score in the Evaluation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Qi Ding, Xia Wei, Jie Li, Yan-Zhong Gao, Shu-Di Xu, Nan Yu, Jiu-Yun Mi, Bai-Bing Mi, You-Min Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian respiratory journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Qi DingDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Ninth Hospital of Xi'an Affiliated with Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710054, China.
Xia WeiDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Ninth Hospital of Xi'an Affiliated with Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710054, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6029-7374
Jie LiDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Ninth Hospital of Xi'an Affiliated with Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710054, China.
Yan-Zhong GaoDepartment of Radiology, The Ninth Hospital of Xi'an Affiliated with Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710054, China.
Shu-Di XuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Ninth Hospital of Xi'an Affiliated with Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710054, China.
Nan YuDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital with Shaanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, Shaanxi 712046, China.
Jiu-Yun MiDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Ninth Hospital of Xi'an Affiliated with Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710054, China.
Bai-Bing MiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics School of Public Health Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Centre, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China.
You-Min GuoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710061, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the emphysema index (EI) in distinguishing chronic bronchitis (CB) from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and its role, combined with the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score, in the evaluation of COPD. Methods: A total of 92 patients with CB and 277 patients with COPD were enrolled in this study. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were analyzed to evaluate whether the EI can preliminarily distinguish chronic bronchitis from COPD. Considering the heterogeneity of COPD, there might be missed diagnosis of some patients with bronchitis type when differentiating COPD patients only by EI. Therefore, patients with COPD were classified according to the CAT score and EI into four groups: Group 1 (EI < 16%, CAT < 10), Group 2 (EI < 16%, CAT ≥ 10), Group 3 (EI ≥ 16%, CAT < 10), and Group 4 (EI ≥ 16%, CAT ≥ 10). The records of pulmonary function and quantitative computed tomography findings were retrospectively analyzed. Results: ROC curve analysis showed that EI = 16.2% was the cutoff value for distinguishing COPD from CB. Groups 1 and 2 exhibited significantly higher maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) percent predicted (pred), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC), maximal midexpiratory flow of 25-75% pred, carbon monoxide-diffusing capacity (DLCO)/alveolar ventilation (VA), FEV1 % pred ( Conclusions: The combination of EI and CAT was effective in the evaluation of COPD.

Indexed as

EmphysemaPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructivePulmonary EmphysemaForced Expiratory VolumeHumansLungRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34691315
PMCPMC8528610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.