ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2021
Robotic single-site surgery versus laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in early-stage endometrial cancer: a case-control study.
Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Cost of Single-Site Robotic Surgery and Single-Site Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecological Diseases: The Era of Single-Site Robotic Surgery May Have Arrived.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical application and early experience of da Vinci Xi robotic single-site laparoscopic gynecologic surgery in mainland China: early experience from a retrospective consecutive cohort of 221 cases.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Comparative outcomes of laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic techniques in the surgical staging of endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2025Review
- Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery by da Vinci Xi system in gynecology: a retrospective series of 721 cases.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- The feasibility and short-term safety of single-site hysterectomy: a retrospective cohort study of a novel robotic platform.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: Robotic Single-Site vs. Multiport Laparoscopic Surgery.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Stability of and Change in Psychopathological Risk Levels in Pre-Early Adolescents before, during, and after Their Study Sojourns: A Descriptive Study.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2024Article
- The role of minimally invasive surgery in gynaecological cancer: an overview of current trends.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2024Article
- Review
- Comparison between Robotic Single-Site and Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomy: Multicentric Analysis of Surgical Outcomes.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Efficacy of transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a retrospective comparison study.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLaparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) can reduce the limited invasiveness of conventional laparoscopy while providing superior cosmetic results. Robotic single-site surgery (RSSS) can overcome this shortcoming to a certain extent.
aimTo evaluate the advantages of RSSS in treating early-stage endometrial cancer by comparing RSSS with LESS. MATERIAL AND
methodsFrom January 2018 to August 2018, patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer from endometrial curettage and imaging studies were selected for this prospective cohort study, with 22 undergoing RSSS and 18 undergoing LESS. All surgical procedures were performed using the conventional da Vinci Si surgical system with the Lagiport single port or a conventional laparoendoscopic instrument with the Lagiport single port. Operative time was recorded electronically. Intraoperative parameters and postoperative parameters were recorded and further analyzed.
resultsThe operation was successfully completed, and a pure single-point approach was adopted. There were no laparotomy or intraoperative complications. Compared with the LESS group, the RSSS group had significantly longer pre-surgical time, significantly lower median operation time, significantly lower median blood loss, and significantly lower vaginal cuff closure time. The median length of hospital stay in the RSSS group was significantly lower than that in the LESS group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of early and late complications between the two groups. No recurrence events were observed in either the RSSS or the LESS group.
conclusionsRSSS is feasible and safe in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer. RSSS can reduce operating time, blood loss and length of hospital stay compared with LESS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.