Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34691306›Full record

ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2021

Comparison of intra-abdominal abscess formation after laparoscopic and open appendectomy for complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis: a retrospective study.

Francesk Mulita, Kerasia-Maria Plachouri, Elias Liolis, Dimitris Kehagias, Ioannis Kehagias

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Association of Polish Surgeons (APS) clinical guidelines for the use of laparoscopy in the management of abdominal emergencies. Part II.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francesk MulitaDepartment of Surgery, General University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Kerasia-Maria PlachouriDepartment of Dermatology, General University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Elias LiolisDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Oncology, General University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Dimitris KehagiasDepartment of Surgery, General University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Ioannis KehagiasDepartment of Surgery, General University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece.
General University Hospital of Patras · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcute appendicitis (AA) is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal pain seen in emergency departments and appendectomy has been the preferred treatment of this disease for decades. Postoperative intra-abdominal abscess (PIAA) complicates 3% to 25% of appendectomies and the risk is highest following complicated appendicitis. However, the risk for intra-abdominal abscess formation after appendectomy is still a matter of debate.

aimTo evaluate PIAA formation after open appendectomy (OA) and laparoscopic appendectomy (LA), in particular in complicated appendicitis. MATERIAL AND

methodsFrom January 2003 to December 2018, records of patients who underwent appendectomy with diagnosis of appendicitis were retrieved from a computer database for analysis.

resultsDuring the study period, 1809 appendectomies were performed in our institution (939 LAs and 850 OAs). Twenty conversion cases were recorded. There was no difference between the incidences of PIAA (LA, 3.73% (35/939) and OA, 3.41% (29/850); p > 0.05). The incidence of PIAA in those with complicated appendicitis was: LA, 11/212 (5.19%) vs. OA 14/198 (7.07%); p > 0.05.

conclusionsThis retrospective study shows that the technique of appendectomy does not appear to affect the incidence of IAAs either in uncomplicated or in complicated appendicitis. However, laparoscopic appendectomy has the advantages of laparoscopic procedures, such as lower hospital stay and earlier return to activities, and should therefore be preferred for acute appendicitis.

Indexed as

appendectomyappendicitiscomplicated appendicitisintra-abdominal abscess

Identifiers

PMID34691306
PMCPMC8512505
OpenAlexW3135497425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.