Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34691236›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2021

Sentiment Analysis Based on the Nursing Notes on In-Hospital 28-Day Mortality of Sepsis Patients Utilizing the MIMIC-III Database.

Qiaoyan Gao, Dandan Wang, Pingping Sun, Xiaorong Luan, Wenfeng Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Caregivers Attitude Detection From Clinical Notes.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qiaoyan GaoNursing Department, Weihai Central Hospital, Weihai, 264400 Shandong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9143-555X
Dandan WangNursing Department, Weihai Central Hospital, Weihai, 264400 Shandong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4436-7296
Pingping SunNursing Department, Weihai Central Hospital, Weihai, 264400 Shandong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4996-9512
Xiaorong LuanNursing Department, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, 250012 Shandong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1667-120X
Wenfeng WangSchool of Science, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai 201418, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0248-5625

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In medical visualization, nursing notes contain rich information about a patient's pathological condition. However, they are not widely used in the prediction of clinical outcomes. With advances in the processing of natural language, information begins to be extracted from large-scale unstructured data like nursing notes. This study extracted sentiment information in nursing notes and explored its association with in-hospital 28-day mortality in sepsis patients. The data of patients and nursing notes were extracted from the MIMIC-III database. A COX proportional hazard model was used to analyze the relationship between sentiment scores in nursing notes and in-hospital 28-day mortality. Based on the COX model, the individual prognostic index (PI) was calculated, and then, survival was analyzed. Among eligible 1851 sepsis patients, 580 cases suffered from in-hospital 28-day mortality (dead group), while 1271 survived (survived group). Significant differences were shown between two groups in sentiment polarity, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS-II) score, age, and intensive care unit (ICU) type (all

Indexed as

Sentiment AnalysisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overComputational BiologyCritical CareDatabases, FactualFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNatural Language ProcessingNursing Records

Identifiers

PMID34691236
PMCPMC8528589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.