Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34691182›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of dentistry2021

Therapeutic Strategies for Dry Mouth Management with Emphasis on Electrostimulation as a Treatment Option.

Amela Tulek, Aida Mulic, Martine Hogset, Tor Paaske Utheim, Amer Sehic

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amela TulekDepartment of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8976-6226
Aida MulicNordic Institute of Dental Materials (NIOM), Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3784-7278
Martine HogsetDepartment of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Tor Paaske UtheimDepartment of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3821-6777
Amer SehicDepartment of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8203-5511
Oslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NONordic Institute of Dental Materials · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesXerostomia is a subjective sensation of dry mouth. It is commonly associated with salivary gland hypofunction. Both changes in the composition of the saliva and a reduction in the quantity secreted may be an objective finding of dry mouth. Although there are no currently available cures for the conditions resulting in dry mouth, there are several treatment options that give hope for patients who suffer from xerostomia. Individuals with some residual salivary gland function, which are contraindicated to pharmacological therapies, would benefit the most from identifying novel, alternative effective methods for stimulating production of saliva. The aim of this study was to give an overview of the latest and most relevant data related to treatment modalities for the management of dry mouth conditions.

conclusionA number of patients showed positive treatment outcomes, and the adverse effects of both electrical stimulation (ES) and acupuncture have been reported as mild and transient. In patients who have undergone radiotherapy, acupuncture is shown to increase salivation. However, in patients with Sjogren's syndrome, the effects of ES devices seem to be elusive. Moreover, due to the instability of the findings in relation to longevity of clinical effect, patient satisfaction, quality of life, and clinical effectiveness of such treatments, the results remain vague.

Identifiers

PMID34691182
PMCPMC8536447
OpenAlexW3207238206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.