Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34691078›Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in immunology2021

Functional Effects of Receptor-Binding Domain Mutations of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.351 and P.1 Variants.

Rafael Bayarri-Olmos, Ida Jarlhelt, Laust Bruun Johnsen, Cecilie Bo Hansen, Charlotte Helgstrand, Jais Rose Bjelke, Finn Matthiesen, Susanne Dam Nielsen, Kasper Karmark Iversen, Sisse Rye Ostrowski and 4 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Rafael Bayarri-OlmosLaboratory of Molecular Medicine, Department of Clinical Immunology, Section 7631, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ida JarlheltLaboratory of Molecular Medicine, Department of Clinical Immunology, Section 7631, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Laust Bruun JohnsenRecombinant Technologies, Novo Nordisk A/S, Måløv, Denmark.
Cecilie Bo HansenLaboratory of Molecular Medicine, Department of Clinical Immunology, Section 7631, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Charlotte HelgstrandRecombinant Technologies, Novo Nordisk A/S, Måløv, Denmark.
Jais Rose BjelkeRecombinant Technologies, Novo Nordisk A/S, Måløv, Denmark.
Finn MatthiesenRecombinant Technologies, Novo Nordisk A/S, Måløv, Denmark.
Susanne Dam NielsenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kasper Karmark IversenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sisse Rye OstrowskiDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henning BundgaardDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ruth Frikke-SchmidtDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Peter GarredLaboratory of Molecular Medicine, Department of Clinical Immunology, Section 7631, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mikkel-Ole SkjoedtLaboratory of Molecular Medicine, Department of Clinical Immunology, Section 7631, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent identification and rise to dominance of the P.1 and B.1.351 SARS-CoV-2 variants have brought international concern because they may confer fitness advantages. The same three positions in the receptor-binding domain (RBD) are affected in both variants, but where the 417 substitution differs, the E484K/N501Y have co-evolved by convergent evolution. Here we characterize the functional and immune evasive consequences of the P.1 and B.1.351 RBD mutations. E484K and N501Y result in gain-of-function with two different outcomes: The N501Y confers a ten-fold affinity increase towards ACE-2, but a modest antibody evasion potential of plasma from convalescent or vaccinated individuals, whereas the E484K displays a significant antibody evasion capacity without a major impact on affinity. On the other hand, the two different 417 substitutions severely impair the RBD/ACE-2 affinity, but in the combined P.1 and B.1.351 RBD variants, this effect is partly counterbalanced by the effect of the E484K and N501Y. Our results suggest that the combination of these three mutations is a two-step forward and one step back in terms of viral fitness.

Indexed as

COVID-19 VaccinesMutation, MissenseSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVaccinationAdultAmino Acid SubstitutionAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Antibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineFemaleHumansMaleProtein DomainsACE2 protein, humanAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Antibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2ACE-2B.1.351E484KN501YP.1RBDSARS-CoV-2variant of concern

Identifiers

PMID34691078
PMCPMC8529273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.