ArticleProceedings. International Conference on Image Processing2019
EARLY ASSESSMENT OF RENAL TRANSPLANTS USING BOLD-MRI: PROMISING RESULTS.
Article in Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A DEEP LEARNING-BASED CAD SYSTEM FOR RENAL ALLOGRAFT ASSESSMENT: DIFFUSION, BOLD, AND CLINICAL BIOMARKERS.Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Non-invasive evaluation of renal transplant function is essential to minimize and manage renal rejection. A computer-assisted diagnostic (CAD) system was developed to evaluate kidney function post-transplantation. The developed CAD system utilizes the amount of blood-oxygenation extracted from 3D (2D + time) blood oxygen level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD-MRI) to estimate renal function. BOLD-MRI scans were acquired at five different echo-times (2, 7, 12, 17, and 22) ms from 15 transplant patients. The developed CAD system first segments kidneys using the level-sets method followed by estimation of the amount of deoxyhemoglobin, also known as apparent relaxation rate (R2*). These R2* estimates were used as discriminatory features (global features (mean R2*) and local features (pixel-wise R2*)) to train and test state-of-the-art machine learning classifiers to differentiate between non-rejection (NR) and acute renal rejection. Using a leave-one-out cross-validation approach along with an artificial neural network (ANN) classifier, the CAD system demonstrated 93.3% accuracy, 100% sensitivity, and 90% specificity in distinguishing AR from non-rejection . These preliminary results demonstrate the efficacy of the CAD system to detect renal allograft status non-invasively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.