Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34690556›Full record

ArticleProceedings. International Conference on Image Processing2019

EARLY ASSESSMENT OF RENAL TRANSPLANTS USING BOLD-MRI: PROMISING RESULTS.

M Shehata, A Shalaby, M Ghazal, M Abou El-Ghar, M A Badawy, G Beache, A Dwyer, M El-Melegy, G Giridharan, R Keynton and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

M ShehataBioengineering Department, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
A ShalabyBioengineering Department, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
M GhazalElectrical and Computer Engineering Department, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
M Abou El-GharRadiology Department, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
M A BadawyRadiology Department, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
G BeacheRadiology Department, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
A DwyerKidney Disease Program, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
M El-MelegyDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
G GiridharanBioengineering Department, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
R KeyntonBioengineering Department, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
A El-BazBioengineering Department, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
University of Louisville · USMansoura University · EGAssiut University · EG

Funding

Big data in acute renal rejectionR15AI135924 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI EL-BAZ, AYMAN S · 2018 to 2018
$455k
NIAID NIH HHS R15 AI135924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-invasive evaluation of renal transplant function is essential to minimize and manage renal rejection. A computer-assisted diagnostic (CAD) system was developed to evaluate kidney function post-transplantation. The developed CAD system utilizes the amount of blood-oxygenation extracted from 3D (2D + time) blood oxygen level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging (BOLD-MRI) to estimate renal function. BOLD-MRI scans were acquired at five different echo-times (2, 7, 12, 17, and 22) ms from 15 transplant patients. The developed CAD system first segments kidneys using the level-sets method followed by estimation of the amount of deoxyhemoglobin, also known as apparent relaxation rate (R2*). These R2* estimates were used as discriminatory features (global features (mean R2*) and local features (pixel-wise R2*)) to train and test state-of-the-art machine learning classifiers to differentiate between non-rejection (NR) and acute renal rejection. Using a leave-one-out cross-validation approach along with an artificial neural network (ANN) classifier, the CAD system demonstrated 93.3% accuracy, 100% sensitivity, and 90% specificity in distinguishing AR from non-rejection . These preliminary results demonstrate the efficacy of the CAD system to detect renal allograft status non-invasively.

Indexed as

BOLD-MRImachine learningmean R2*pixel-wise R2*Renal Transplants

Identifiers

PMID34690556
PMCPMC8536147
OpenAlexW2971345637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.