Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34690541›Full record

ArticleThe European physical journal. B2021

Differences in social activity increase efficiency of contact tracing.

Bjarke Frost Nielsen, Kim Sneppen, Lone Simonsen, Joachim Mathiesen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European physical journal. B, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Heterogeneity in testing for infectious diseases.Royal Society open science · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bjarke Frost NielsenNiels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3868-9187
Kim SneppenNiels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9820-3567
Lone SimonsenDepartment of Science and Environment, Roskilde University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1535-8526
Joachim MathiesenNiels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 17, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5621-5487

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractDigital contact tracing has been suggested as an effective strategy for controlling an epidemic without severely limiting personal mobility. Here, we use smartphone proximity data to explore how social structure affects contact tracing of COVID-19. We model the spread of COVID-19 and find that the effectiveness of contact tracing depends strongly on social network structure and heterogeneous social activity. Contact tracing is shown to be remarkably effective in a workplace environment and the effectiveness depends strongly on the minimum duration of contact required to initiate quarantine. In a realistic social network, we find that forward contact tracing with immediate isolation can reduce an epidemic by more than 70%. In perspective, our findings highlight the necessity of incorporating social heterogeneity into models of mitigation strategies. GRAPHIC ABSTRACT: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version supplementary material available at 10.1140/epjb/s10051-021-00222-8.

Identifiers

PMID34690541
PMCPMC8523203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.