Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34690528›Full record

ArticleRenewable & sustainable energy reviews2022

Energy and environmental sustainability of waste personal protective equipment (PPE) treatment under COVID-19.

Xiang Zhao, Jiří Jaromír Klemeš, Fengqi You

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Renewable & sustainable energy reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiang ZhaoSystems Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Jiří Jaromír KlemešSustainable Process Integration Laboratory - SPIL, NETME Centre, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno University of Technology - VUT Brno, Technická 2896/2, 616 69, Brno, Czech Republic.
Fengqi YouSystems Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combating the COVID-19 pandemic has raised the demand for and disposal of personal protective equipment in the United States. This work proposes a novel waste personal protective equipment processing system that enables energy recovery through producing renewable fuels and other basic chemicals. Exergy analysis and environmental assessment through a detailed life cycle assessment approach are performed to evaluate the energy and environmental sustainability of the processing system. Given the environmental advantages in reducing 35.42% of total greenhouse gas emissions from the conventional incineration and 43.50% of total fossil fuel use from landfilling processes, the optimal number, sizes, and locations of establishing facilities within the proposed personal protective equipment processing system in New York State are then determined by an optimization-based site selection methodology, proposing to build two pre-processing facilities in New York County and Suffolk County and one integrated fast pyrolysis plant in Rockland County. Their optimal annual treatment capacities are 1,708 t/y, 8,000 t/y, and 9,028 t/y. The proposed optimal personal protective equipment processing system reduces 31.5% of total fossil fuel use and 35.04% of total greenhouse gas emissions compared to the personal protective equipment incineration process. It also avoids 41.52% and 47.64% of total natural land occupation from the personal protective equipment landfilling and incineration processes.

Indexed as

CAPEX, Capital expenditurefec, Feedstock cost MUSDFossil fuel reductionGAO US, Government Accountability OfficeGHG emissionsGHG, Greenhouse gasGWP, Global warming potentialHEPA, High-Efficiency Particulate ArrestanceHEX, Heat exchangersHP, High-pressure steaminc, revenue from downstream products MUSDLCA, Life cycle assessmentLCI, Life cycle inventoryLife cycle assessmentLP, Low-pressure steamMEA, MonoethanolamineMILP, Mixed-integer linear programmingMINLP, Mixed-integer nonlinear programmingMP, Mid-pressure steamMSDS, Material Safety Data SheetNMVOC, Non-methane volatile organic compoundNPV, Net present valueNYS, New York Stateobj, Annualized cost MUSDomc, Operation and maintenance cost MUSDO&M, Operation and maintenance costOPEX, Operating expenditurePPE, Personal protective equipmentPPE processing systemProcess designPSA, Pressure-swing adsorptionSD, Solid waste disposal fee MUSDstor, The total storage cost MUSDtci, Total capital cost MUSDTEA, Techno-economic analysisTechno-economic analysistran, Total transportation cost MUSDuc, Total utility cost MUSD

Identifiers

PMID34690528
PMCPMC8521346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.