Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34690434›Full record

ArticleScience & education2023

The Impact of Life Philosophy and Major Field of Study on Brazilian Students' Knowledge of Biological Evolution.

Guilherme Ramos Demetrio, Uedson Pereira Jacobina, Kim Ribeiro Barão

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science & education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guilherme Ramos DemetrioUnidade Educacional Penedo, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Penedo, AL Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6481-1633
Uedson Pereira JacobinaUnidade Educacional Penedo, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Penedo, AL Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5595-9812
Kim Ribeiro BarãoUnidade Educacional Penedo, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Penedo, AL Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1432-1756

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary theory (ET) is the unifying theory of Life Sciences, but it is largely misunderstood and the target of dispute in many countries, mainly because of conflicts with religious beliefs. Brazil is a country with a culture that is deeply rooted belief in God. In this paper, we report a study in Brazil where we applied a 12-question questionnaire to understand the relationship among the major field of study and the self-declared religious and philosophical context on the knowledge of evolutionary theory by Brazilian freshmen. We answer the following questions: (1) Is there a difference in ET comprehension according to the major field of study? (2) Are religious and philosophical contexts related to the comprehension of ET? (3) Are major field of study and religious/philosophical contexts together related to the comprehension of ET by Brazilian freshmen? A total of 153 freshmen students answered our questionnaire. Students from the Biological Sciences fared better than students from most other major field of study but were equal to students of Humanities. The philosophical perception of life had a major correlation with their knowledge about evolution, with self-declared atheists and agnostics showing better performance than religious students. There were no clear trends in the interaction of major field of study and philosophy of life. We discuss these results in the light of the rising ideological activism in Brazilian society since philosophy of life was the main driver of evolutionary theory perception. We highlight the importance of scientists and teachers in reassuring the role of science and scientific knowledge in modern societies. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11191-021-00286-z.

Indexed as

CreationismEvolutionary biologyMisconceptionsReligionTeaching evolution

Identifiers

PMID34690434
PMCPMC8520115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.