ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2022
Exploiting family history in aggregation unit-based genetic association tests.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using Family History Data to Improve the Power of Association Studies: Application to Cancer in UK Biobank.Genetic epidemiology · 2025Article
- Leveraging family history in genetic association analyses of binary traits.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- A novel heterozygous variant in PANX1 is associated with oocyte death and female infertility.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2022Article
- Family history aggregation unit-based tests to detect rare genetic variant associations with application to the Framingham Heart Study.American journal of human genetics · 2022Article
- Pannexin 1 as a driver of inflammation and ischemia-reperfusion injury.Purinergic signalling · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The development of sequencing technology calls for new powerful methods to detect disease associations and lower the cost of sequencing studies. Family history (FH) contains information on disease status of relatives, adding valuable information about the probands' health problems and risk of diseases. Incorporating data from FH is a cost-effective way to improve statistical evidence in genetic studies, and moreover, overcomes limitations in study designs with insufficient cases or missing genotype information for association analysis. We proposed family history aggregation unit-based test (FHAT) and optimal FHAT (FHAT-O) to exploit available FH for rare variant association analysis. Moreover, we extended liability threshold model of case-control status and FH (LT-FH) method in aggregated unit-based methods and compared that with FHAT and FHAT-O. The computational efficiency and flexibility of the FHAT and FHAT-O were demonstrated through both simulations and applications. We showed that FHAT, FHAT-O, and LT-FH methods offer reasonable control of the type I error unless case/control ratio is unbalanced, in which case they result in smaller inflation than that observed with conventional methods excluding FH. We also demonstrated that FHAT and FHAT-O are more powerful than LT-FH and conventional methods in many scenarios. By applying FHAT and FHAT-O to the analysis of all cause dementia and hypertension using the exome sequencing data from the UK Biobank, we showed that our methods can improve significance for known regions. Furthermore, we replicated the previous associations in all cause dementia and hypertension and detected novel regions through the exome-wide analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.