ArticleClinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology2021
Satisfaction Survey on Antipsychotic Formulations by Schizophrenia Patients in Japan.
Article in Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perceived Utility of Combining Atypical Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics With Psychosocial Interventions: An Exploratory Survey of Mid-Career Psychiatrists in Japan.Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2026Article
- One-Year Evaluation of Paliperidone Palmitate 6-Monthly: Satisfaction and Perceived Effectiveness Among Patients, Relatives, and Clinicians.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Quantifying the Tolerability of Antipsychotic Treatment-Related Side Effects in Schizophrenia: A Survey Study of Patients and Caregiver Proxies.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Evaluating Adverse Drug Reactions, Their Reporting Rates and Their Impact on Attitudes Toward Pharmacotherapy Among Female Patients with Schizophrenia: Insights and Implications from a Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Antipsychotic Use: Cross-Sectional Opinion Survey of Psychiatrists in India and United Kingdom.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Polypharmacy Management of Antipsychotics in Patients with Schizophrenia.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Review
- Patient Factors Influencing Outpatient Retention in Patients with Affective and Anxiety Disorders: A Retrospective Study.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021Article
- Treatment Continuation of Asenapine or Olanzapine in Japanese Schizophrenia Patients: A Propensity Score Matched Study.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify factors affecting adherence to medication, a subjective questionnaire survey was administered to schizophrenia patients regarding the prescribed antipsychotic formulations.
methodsWe evaluated the patients' satisfaction and dissatisfaction with prescribed antipsychotic formulations, and patients answered the Drug Attitude Inventory-10 Questionnaire (DAI-10). Inclusion criteria for patients are as follows: age between 20 and 75 years and taking antipsychotic agents containing the same ingredients and formulations, for at least 1 month.
resultsIn total, 301 patients answered the questionnaire survey. Tablets were found to be the most commonly used antipsychotic formulations among schizophrenia patients (n = 174, 57.8%), followed by long-acting injections (LAIs, n = 93, 30.9%). No significant differences in the formulation satisfaction level and DAI-10 scores were observed between all formulations. Formulations, except for LAI, were selected by physicians in more than half of the patients. Patients who answered "Decided by consultation with physicians" had significantly higher satisfaction levels and DAI-10 scores compared to those who answered "Decided by physicians" (4.11 ± 0.77 vs. 3.80 ± 1.00,
conclusionNo formulation had a high satisfaction level in all patients, and it is important to be reflect the patients' individual preferences in pharmacotherapy. Shared decision-making in the selection of the formulations is seen to be useful for improving medication adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.