Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34689830›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2021

Facilitating treatment engagement for early psychosis through peer-delivered decision support: intervention development and protocol for pilot evaluation.

Elizabeth C Thomas, John Suarez, Alicia Lucksted, Laura A Siminoff, Irene Hurford, Lisa B Dixon, Maria O'Connell, David L Penn, Mark S Salzer

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04532034 (Facilitating Emerging Adults Engagement in Evidenced-Based Treatment for Early Psychosis Through Peer-Delivered Decision Support), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04532034 nacompletednot on this map

Facilitating Emerging Adults Engagement in Evidenced-Based Treatment for Early Psychosis Through Peer-Delivered Decision Support

TypeinterventionalSponsorTemple UniversityRan2020 to 2023Enrolled12ConditionsPsychotic DisordersArmsPeer-Delivered Decision Support Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elizabeth C ThomasTemple University College of Public Health, 1700 N Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19121, USA. elizabeth.thomas@temple.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6543-9856
John SuarezTemple University College of Public Health, 1700 N Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19121, USA.
Alicia LuckstedUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, 737 West Lombard Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Laura A SiminoffTemple University College of Public Health, 1700 N Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19121, USA.
Irene HurfordIrene Hurford MD PLLC, 261 Old York Road #925, Jenkintown, PA, 19046, USA.
Lisa B DixonColumbia University Department of Psychiatry, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Maria O'ConnellYale University School of Medicine, 300 George Street, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.
David L PennDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 256 Davie Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA.
Mark S SalzerTemple University College of Public Health, 1700 N Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19121, USA.

Funding

Supplement: Facilitating Emerging Adult Engagement in Evidence-Based Treatment for Early Psychosis through Peer-Delivered Decision.K08MH116101 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI THOMAS, ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2022
$739k
NIMH NIH HHS K08 MH116101NIMH NIH HHS K08MH116101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmerging adults with early psychosis demonstrate high rates of service disengagement from critical early intervention services. Decision support interventions and peer support have both been shown to enhance service engagement but are understudied in this population. The purposes of this article are to describe the development of a novel peer-delivered decision coaching intervention for this population and to report plans for a pilot study designed to gather preliminary data about its feasibility, acceptability, and potential impact.

methodsThe intervention was developed based on formative qualitative data and in collaboration with a diverse team of researchers, key stakeholders, and expert consultants. The pilot trial will utilize a single-group (N = 20), pre-post, convergent mixed-methods design to explore whether and how the intervention addresses decision-making needs (the primary intervention target). The impact of the intervention on secondary outcomes (e.g., engagement in the program) will also be assessed. Additionally, through observation and feedback from the peer decision coach and study participants, we will evaluate the feasibility of research and intervention procedures, and the acceptability of information and support from the peer decision coach. DISCUSSION: The peer-delivered decision coaching intervention holds promise for assisting young people with making informed and values-consistent decisions about their care, and potentially enhancing service engagement within this traditionally difficult-to-engage population. If the intervention demonstrates feasibility and acceptability, and pilot data show its potential for improving treatment decision-making, our work will also lay the foundation for a new evidence base regarding roles for peer specialists on early intervention teams.

trial registrationThis trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04532034 ) on 28 August 2020 as Temple University Protocol Record 261047, Facilitating Engagement in Evidence-Based Treatment for Early Psychosis.

Indexed as

Coordinated specialty careFirst-episode psychosisPeer supportShared decision makingYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID34689830
PMCPMC8543800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.