Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34689745›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical research methodology2021

Methodological challenges and solution strategies during implementation of a midwife-led multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) in maternity hospitals.

Sabine Striebich, Elke Mattern, Theresa Oganowski, Rainhild Schäfers, Gertrud Ayerle

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical research methodology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sabine StriebichMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Magdeburger Str. 8, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany. sabine.striebich@medizin.uni-halle.de.
Elke MatternHochschule für Gesundheit Bochum - University of Applied Sciences, Gesundheitscampus 6 - 8, 44801, Bochum, Germany.
Theresa OganowskiHochschule für Gesundheit Bochum - University of Applied Sciences, Gesundheitscampus 6 - 8, 44801, Bochum, Germany.
Rainhild SchäfersHochschule für Gesundheit Bochum - University of Applied Sciences, Gesundheitscampus 6 - 8, 44801, Bochum, Germany.
Gertrud AyerleMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Health and Nursing Science, Magdeburger Str. 8, 06112, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Hochschule für Gesundheit - University of Applied Sciences · DEMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRandomized controlled trials (RCTs), especially multicentric, with complex interventions are methodically challenging. Careful planning under everyday conditions in compliance with the relevant international quality standard (Good Clinical Practice [GCP] guideline) is crucial. Specific challenges exist for RCTs conducted in delivery rooms due to various factors that cannot be planned beforehand. Few published RCTs report challenges and problems in implementing complex interventions in maternity wards. In Germany as well as in other countries, midwives and obstetricians have frequently little experience as investigators in clinical trials.

methodsThe aim is to describe the key methodological and organizational challenges in conducting a multicenter study in maternity wards and the solution strategies applied to them. In particular, project-related and process-oriented challenges for hospital staff are considered. The exemplarily presented randomized controlled trial "BE-UP" investigates the effectiveness of an alternative design of a birthing room on the rate of vaginal births and women-specific outcomes.

resultsThe results are presented in five sectors: 1) Selection of and support for cooperating hospitals: they are to be selected according to predefined criteria, and strategies to offer continuous support in trial implementation must be mapped out. 2) Establishing a process of requesting informed consent: a quality-assured process to inform pregnant women early on must be feasible and effective. 3) Individual digital real-time randomization: In addition to instructing maternity teams, appropriate measures for technical failure must be provided. 4) The standardized birthing room: The complex intervention is to be implemented according to the study protocol yet adapted to the prevailing conditions in the delivery rooms. 5) GCP-compliant documentation: midwives and obstetricians will be instructed in high-quality data collection, supported by external monitoring throughout the trial.

conclusionSince not all potential challenges can be anticipated in the planning of a trial, study teams need to be flexible and react promptly to any problems that threaten recruitment or the implementation of the complex intervention. Thought should be given to the perspectives of midwives and obstetricians as recruiters and how clinic-intern processes could be adapted to correspond with the trial's requirements.

trial registrationThe BE-UP study was registered on 07/03/ 2018 in the German Register for Clinical Trials under Reference No. DRKS00012854 and can also be found on the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (see https://apps.who.int/trialsearch/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=DRKS0001285 ).

Indexed as

MidwiferyFemaleGermanyHospitals, MaternityHumansParturitionPregnancyPregnant People

Identifiers

PMID34689745
PMCPMC8542460
OpenAlexW3179089489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.