Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34689617›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2021

Robustness of convolutional neural networks to physiological electrocardiogram noise.

J Venton, P M Harris, A Sundar, N A S Smith, P J Aston

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J VentonDepartment of Data Science, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0547-1226
P M HarrisDepartment of Data Science, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.
A SundarDepartment of Data Science, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.
N A S SmithDepartment of Data Science, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.
P J AstonDepartment of Data Science, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.
National Physical Laboratory · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The electrocardiogram (ECG) is a widespread diagnostic tool in healthcare and supports the diagnosis of cardiovascular disorders. Deep learning methods are a successful and popular technique to detect indications of disorders from an ECG signal. However, there are open questions around the robustness of these methods to various factors, including physiological ECG noise. In this study, we generate clean and noisy versions of an ECG dataset before applying symmetric projection attractor reconstruction (SPAR) and scalogram image transformations. A convolutional neural network is used to classify these image transforms. For the clean ECG dataset, F1 scores for SPAR attractor and scalogram transforms were 0.70 and 0.79, respectively. Scores decreased by less than 0.05 for the noisy ECG datasets. Notably, when the network trained on clean data was used to classify the noisy datasets, performance decreases of up to 0.18 in F1 scores were seen. However, when the network trained on the noisy data was used to classify the clean dataset, the decrease was less than 0.05. We conclude that physiological ECG noise impacts classification using deep learning methods and careful consideration should be given to the inclusion of noisy ECG signals in the training data when developing supervised networks for ECG classification. This article is part of the theme issue 'Advanced computation in cardiovascular physiology: new challenges and opportunities'.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiographyNeural Networks, Computerconvolutional neural networkdeep learningelectrocardiogramphysiological noiserobustnesssymmetric projection attractor reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID34689617
PMCPMC8543045
OpenAlexW3209744178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.