Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34689614›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2021

A novel artificial intelligence based intensive care unit monitoring system: using physiological waveforms to identify sepsis.

Maximiliano Mollura, Li-Wei H Lehman, Roger G Mark, Riccardo Barbieri

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [Artificial intelligence in intensive care medicine].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maximiliano MolluraDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2248-8145
Li-Wei H LehmanInstitute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Roger G MarkInstitute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Riccardo BarbieriDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · USPolitecnico di Milano · IT

Funding

Critical Care Informatics: Ethical considerations around the use and sharing of health-related dataR01EB017205 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI CELI, LEO ANTHONY G, MARK, ROGER GREENWOOD · 2014 to 2021
$3.8M
Critical Care InformaticsR56EB017205 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI CELI, LEO ANTHONY G, GHASSEMI, MARZYEH · 2018 to 2023
$783k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017205NIBIB NIH HHS R56 EB017205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A massive amount of multimodal data are continuously collected in the intensive care unit (ICU) along each patient stay, offering a great opportunity for the development of smart monitoring devices based on artificial intelligence (AI). The two main sources of relevant information collected in the ICU are the electronic health records (EHRs) and vital sign waveforms continuously recorded at the bedside. While EHRs are already widely processed by AI algorithms for prompt diagnosis and prognosis, AI-based assessments of the patients' pathophysiological state using waveforms are less developed, and their use is still limited to real-time monitoring for basic visual vital sign feedback at the bedside. This study uses data from the MIMIC-III database (PhysioNet) to propose a novel AI approach in ICU patient monitoring that incorporates features estimated by a closed-loop cardiovascular model, with the specific goal of identifying sepsis within the first hour of admission. Our top benchmark results (AUROC = 0.92, AUPRC = 0.90) suggest that features derived by cardiovascular control models may play a key role in identifying sepsis, by continuous monitoring performed through advanced multivariate modelling of vital sign waveforms. This work lays foundations for a deeper data integration paradigm which will help clinicians in their decision-making processes. This article is part of the theme issue 'Advanced computation in cardiovascular physiology: new challenges and opportunities'.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceSepsisCritical CareHumansIntensive Care UnitsMonitoring, Physiologiccardiovascular modellingcontinuous monitoringintensive care unitmachine learningmultimodal datasepsis

Identifiers

PMID34689614
PMCPMC8805602
OpenAlexW3211252851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.