Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34689307›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2021

The centrally restricted diffusion sign on MRI for assessment of radiation necrosis in metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery.

Nicolin Hainc, Noor Alsafwani, Andrew Gao, Philip J O'Halloran, Paul Kongkham, Gelareh Zadeh, Enrique Gutierrez, David Shultz, Timo Krings, Paula Alcaide-Leon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Auxiliary Value of [Cancers · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Emerging Studies of Melanoma Brain Metastasis.Current oncology reports · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicolin HaincDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Nicolin.hainc@usz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0916-7387
Noor AlsafwaniLaboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Andrew GaoLaboratory Medicine Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Philip J O'HalloranNeurosurgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Paul KongkhamNeurosurgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Gelareh ZadehNeurosurgery, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Enrique GutierrezRadiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.
David ShultzRadiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Timo KringsDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Paula Alcaide-LeonDepartment of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
University Health Network · CAPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDifferentiation of radiation necrosis from tumor progression in brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is challenging. For this, we assessed the performance of the centrally restricted diffusion sign.

methodsPatients with brain metastases treated with SRS who underwent a subsequent intervention (biopsy/resection) for a ring-enhancing lesion on preoperative MRI between 2000 and 2020 were included. Excluded were lesions containing increased susceptibility limiting assessment of DWI. Two neuroradiologists classified the location of the diffusion restriction with respect to the post-contrast T1 images as centrally within the ring-enhancement (the centrally restricted diffusion sign), peripherally correlating to the rim of contrast enhancement, both locations, or none. Measures of diagnostic accuracy and 95% CI were calculated for the centrally restricted diffusion sign. Cohen's kappa was calculated to identify the interobserver agreement.

resultsFifty-nine patients (36 female; mean age 59, range 40 to 80) were included, 36 with tumor progression and 23 with radiation necrosis based on histopathology. Primary tumors included 34 lung, 12 breast, 5 melanoma, 3 colorectal, 2 esophagus, 1 head and neck, 1 endometrium, and 1 thyroid. The centrally restricted diffusion sign was seen in 19/23 radiation necrosis cases (sensitivity 83% (95% CI 63 to 93%), specificity 64% (95% CI 48 to 78%), PPV 59% (95% CI 42 to 74%), NPV 85% (95% CI 68 to 94%)) and 13/36 tumor progression cases (difference p < 0.001). Interobserver agreement was substantial, at 0.61 (95% CI 0.45 to 70.8).

conclusionWe found a low probability of radiation necrosis in the absence of the centrally restricted diffusion sign.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsRadiation InjuriesRadiosurgeryAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNecrosisRetrospective StudiesDiffusion magnetic resonance imagingNecrosisRadiation injuriesRadiation surgery

Identifiers

PMID34689307
PMCPMC8651583
OpenAlexW3208855641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.