Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34689224›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2023

Medial bicompartmental arthroplasty patients display more normal gait and improved satisfaction, compared to matched total knee arthroplasty patients.

Amy J Garner, Oliver W Dandridge, Richard J van Arkel, Justin P Cobb

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06883591 (Physical Activity in Patients After Resurfacing and Total Hip Arthroplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06883591 completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Physical Activity in Patients After Resurfacing and Total Hip Arthroplasty: an Observational Follow-up Study 15 Years After Surgery.

TypeobservationalSponsorRijnstate HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled32ConditionsTotal Hip Arthroplasty (THA), Accelerometers, Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Current status of bicompartmental arthroplasty.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amy J GarnerMSk Lab, Sir Michael Uren Biomedical Engineering Research Hub, Imperial College London, White City Campus, 80-92 Wood Lane, London, W12 0BZ, UK. a.garner@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7839-0641
Oliver W DandridgeBiomechanics Group, Mechanical Engineering Department, Imperial College London, London, SW7 1AZ, UK.
Richard J van ArkelBiomechanics Group, Mechanical Engineering Department, Imperial College London, London, SW7 1AZ, UK.
Justin P CobbMSk Lab, Sir Michael Uren Biomedical Engineering Research Hub, Imperial College London, White City Campus, 80-92 Wood Lane, London, W12 0BZ, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMedial bicompartmental arthroplasty, the combination of ipsilateral medial unicompartmental and patellofemoral arthroplasty, is an alternative to total knee arthroplasty for patients with medial tibiofemoral and severe patellofemoral arthritis, when the lateral tibiofemoral compartment and anterior cruciate ligament are intact. This study reports the gait and subjective outcomes following medial bicompartmental arthroplasty.

methodsFifty-five subjects were measured on the instrumented treadmill at top walking speeds, using standard metrics of gait. Modular, single-stage, medial bicompartmental arthroplasty subjects (n = 16) were compared to age, body mass index, height- and sex-matched healthy (n = 19) and total knee arthroplasty (n = 20) subjects. Total knee arthroplasty subjects with pre-operative evidence of tricompartmental osteoarthritis or anterior cruciate ligament dysfunction were excluded. The vertical component of ground reaction force and temporospatial measurements were compared using Kruskal-Wallis, then Mann-Whitney test with Bonferroni correction (α = 0.05). Oxford Knee and EuroQoL EQ-5D scores were compared.

resultsObjectively, the medial bicompartmental arthroplasty top walking speed of 6.7 ± 0.8 km/h was 0.5 km/h (7%) slower than that of healthy controls (p = 0.2), but 1.3 km/h (24%) faster than that of total knee arthroplasty subjects (5.4 ± 0.6 km/h, p < 0.001). Medial bicompartmental arthroplasty recorded more normal maximum weight acceptance (p < 0.001) and mid-stance forces (p = 0.03) than total knee arthroplasty subjects, with 11 cm (15%) longer steps (p < 0.001) and 21 cm (14%) longer strides (p = 0.006). Subjectively, medial bicompartmental arthroplasty subjects reported Oxford Knee Scores of median 41 (interquartile range 38.8-45.5) compared to total knee arthroplasty Oxford Knee Scores of 38 (interquartile range 30.5-41, p < 0.02). Medial bicompartmental arthroplasty subjects reported EQ-5D median 0.88 (interquartile range 0.84-0.94) compared to total knee arthroplasty median 0.81 (interquartile range 0.73-0.89, p < 0.02.)

conclusionThis study finds that, in the treatment of medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis with severe patellofemoral arthritis, medial bicompartmental arthroplasty results in nearer-normal gait and improved patient-reported outcomes compared to total knee arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisOsteoarthritis, KneeGaitHumansKnee JointPatient SatisfactionTreatment OutcomeBicompartmental knee arthroplastyCompartmental arthroplastyGaitMedial with patellofemoral arthroplastySatisfactionTotal knee arthroplastyWalking speed

Identifiers

PMID34689224
PMCPMC9958162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.