Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34689003›Full record

ArticleTicks and tick-borne diseases2022

Tracking tick-borne diseases in Mongolian livestock using next generation sequencing (NGS).

Suwanna Chaorattanakawee, Rachel N Wofford, Ratree Takhampunya, B Katherine Poole-Smith, Bazartseren Boldbaatar, Sukhbaatar Lkhagvatseren, Doniddemberel Altantogtokh, Elisha Musih, Pagbajab Nymadawa, Silas Davidson and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ticks and tick-borne diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Molecular Detection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Metagenomic profiles ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Suwanna ChaorattanakaweeDepartment of Entomology, US Army Medical Directorate of the Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (USAMD-AFRIMS), Bangkok, Thailand; Department of Parasitology and Entomology, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rachel N WoffordDepartment of Global and Community Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Ratree TakhampunyaDepartment of Entomology, US Army Medical Directorate of the Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (USAMD-AFRIMS), Bangkok, Thailand.
B Katherine Poole-SmithDepartment of Entomology, US Army Medical Directorate of the Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (USAMD-AFRIMS), Bangkok, Thailand.
Bazartseren BoldbaatarMongolian University of Life Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Sukhbaatar LkhagvatserenMongolian University of Life Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Doniddemberel AltantogtokhNational Center for Zoonotic Diseases, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Elisha MusihDepartment of Global and Community Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Pagbajab NymadawaMongolian Academy of Medical Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Silas DavidsonDepartment of Entomology, US Army Medical Directorate of the Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences (USAMD-AFRIMS), Bangkok, Thailand; Department of Chemistry and Life Science, US Military Academy, West Point, NY, USA.
Jeffrey HertzNaval Medical Research Unit TWO (NAMRU-2), Sembawang, Singapore.
Jodi FiorenzanoNaval Medical Research Unit TWO (NAMRU-2), Sembawang, Singapore.
Gregory C GrayDivision of Infectious Diseases and Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Michael E von FrickenDepartment of Global and Community Health, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA. Electronic address: mvonfric@gmu.edu.
George Mason University · USArmed Forces Research Institute of Medical Science · THMongolian University of Life Sciences · MNDuke University · USMahidol University · THMongolian Academy of Sciences · MNNational Center for Communicable Diseases · MNUnited States Military Academy · US

Funding

One Health Innovation Fellowships for Zoonotic Disease Research In MongoliaD43TW009373 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI GRAY, GREGORY CHARLES · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The livestock industry in Mongolia accounts for 24% of national revenue, with one third of the population maintaining a pastoral lifestyle. This close connection between Mongolian population and livestock is a major concern for pathogen transfer, especially given the increase in vector-borne diseases globally. This study examines blood samples from livestock to assess the prevalence of tick-borne bacterial infections across three provinces in Mongolia (Dornogovi, Selenge, Töv). Whole blood samples from 243 livestock (cattle=38, camel=11, goat=85, horse=22, sheep=87) were analyzed with 16S metagenomics next-generation sequencing (NGS) to screen for bacterial pathogens. Positive-NGS samples for Anaplasma, Bartonella, Ehrlichia, Francisella, Leptospira, and Rickettsia were confirmed by conventional PCR and DNA sequencing. Prevalence rates of Anaplasma, Bartonella, and Ehrlichia were 57.6%, 12.8%, and 0.4%, respectively. A significant difference in the prevalence of Anaplasma spp. in livestock by province was observed, with a higher prevalence in Selenge (74.2%, p<0.001) and Töv (64.2% p = 0.006) compared to the semi-arid region of Dornogovi (39.8%). In contrast, no association was observed in Bartonella prevalence by provinces. All Anaplasma sequences (N = 139) were characterized as A. ovis. For Bartonella species characterization, phylogenetic analyses of gltA and rpoB genes identified three Bartonella species including B. bovis, B. melophagi and Candidatus B. ovis. Bartonella bovis was detected in all 22-positive cattle, while B. melophagi and Candidatus B. ovis were found in four and three sheep, respectively. This study identifies a high prevalence of tick-borne pathogens within the livestock population and to our knowledge, is the first time NGS methods have been used to explore tick-borne diseases in Mongolia. Further research is needed in Mongolia to better understand the clinical and economic burdens associated with tick-borne diseases in both livestock and pastoral herder populations.

Indexed as

LivestockTick-Borne DiseasesAnaplasmaAnimalsCattleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHorsesPhylogenySheepAnaplasmaBartonellaMongoliaNext generation sequencingOne healthTick-borne disease

Identifiers

PMID34689003
PMCPMC8665119
OpenAlexW3206878974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.