Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34688966›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics2022

Dietary and Complementary Feeding Practices of US Infants, 6 to 12 Months: A Narrative Review of the Federal Nutrition Monitoring Data.

Regan L Bailey, Jaime S Stang, Teresa A Davis, Timothy S Naimi, Barbara O Schneeman, Kathryn G Dewey, Sharon M Donovan, Rachel Novotny, Ronald E Kleinman, Elsie M Taveras and 12 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. The effect of the Baby-Feed website intervention on diet quality in healthy infants: a randomized controlled trial.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2026
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Regan L BaileyDepartment of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. Electronic address: reganbailey@purdue.edu.
Jaime S StangDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities, MN.
Teresa A DavisUnited States Department of Agriculture/Agricultural Research Service Children's Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
Timothy S NaimiSection of General Internal Medicine, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Barbara O SchneemanDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA.
Kathryn G DeweyDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA.
Sharon M DonovanDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Endowed Chair in Nutrition and Health, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
Rachel NovotnyDepartment Human Nutrition Food and Animal Science, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI.
Ronald E KleinmanHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Elsie M TaverasDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Lydia BazzanoTulane Center for Lifespan Epidemiology Research, New Orleans, LA.
Linda G SnetselaarDepartment of Epidemiology, Endowed Chair in Preventive Nutrition Education, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Janet de JesusOffice of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD.
Kellie O CasavaleOffice of Nutrition and Food Labeling, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services, College Park, MD.
Eve E StoodyCenter for Nutrition Policy and Promotion, Food and Nutrition Service, US Department of Agriculture, Alexandria, VA.
Joseph D GoldmanFood Surveys Research Group, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD.
Alanna J MoshfeghFood Surveys Research Group, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD.
Donna G RhodesFood Surveys Research Group, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD.
Kirsten A HerrickRisk Factor Assessment Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Kristin KoegelCenter for Nutrition Policy and Promotion, Food and Nutrition Service, US Department of Agriculture, Alexandria, VA.
Cria G PerrineDivision of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
TusaRebecca PannucciFood Surveys Research Group, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, MD.
Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion · USUniversity of California, Davis · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USNational Cancer Institute · USOffice of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complementary foods and beverages (CFBs) are key components of an infant's diet in the second 6 months of life. This article summarizes nutrition and feeding practices examined by the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committees during the CFB life stage. Breastfeeding initiation is high (84%), but exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months (26%) is below the Healthy People 2030 goal (42%). Most infants (51%) are introduced to CFBs sometime before 6 months. The primary mode of feeding (ie, human milk fed [HMF]; infant formula or mixed formula and human milk fed [FMF]) at the initiation of CFBs is associated with the timing of introduction and types of CFBs reported. FMF infants (42%) are more likely to be introduced to CFBs before 4 months compared with HMF infants (19%). Different dietary patterns, such as higher prevalence of consumption and mean amounts, were observed, including fruit, grains, dairy, proteins, and solid fats. Compared with HMF infants of the same age, FMF infants consume more total energy (845 vs 631 kcal) and protein (22 vs 12 g) from all sources, and more energy (345 vs 204 kcal) and protein (11 vs 6 g) from CFBs alone. HMF infants have a higher prevalence of risk of inadequate intakes of iron (77% vs 7%), zinc (54% vs <3%), and protein (27% vs <3%). FMF infants are more likely to have an early introduction (<12 months) to fruit juice (45% vs 20%) and cow's milk (36% vs 24%). Registered dietitian nutritionists and nutritional professionals should consider tailoring their advice to caregivers on dietary and complementary feeding practices, taking into account the primary mode of milk feeding during this life stage to support infants' nutrient adequacy. National studies that address the limitations of this analysis, including small sample sizes and imputed breast milk volume, could refine findings from this analysis.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsCattleDietFemaleHumansInfantInfant FormulaMilk, HumanBirth to 24 monthsBreastfeedingComplementary feedingDietary guidelinesNutrition policyPediatrics

Identifiers

PMID34688966
PMCPMC10851078
OpenAlexW3205771910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.