Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34688807›Full record

ArticleRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology2021

Proton reirradiation for recurrent or new primary breast cancer in the setting of prior breast irradiation.

J Isabelle Choi, Atif J Khan, Simon N Powell, Beryl McCormick, Alicia J Lozano, Gabriely Del Rosario, Jacqueline Mamary, Haoyang Liu, Pamela Fox, Erin Gillespie and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evaluation of normal tissue complications in breast cancer re-irradiation: a meta-analysis study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. FLASH proton reirradiation, with or without hypofractionation, reduces chronic toxicity in the normal murine intestine, skin, and bone.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2025
    Article
  8. ACR-ARS Practice Parameter for the Performance of Proton Beam Therapy.International journal of particle therapy · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J Isabelle ChoiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; New York Proton Center, New York, USA. Electronic address: choij3@mskcc.org.
Atif J KhanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Simon N PowellDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Beryl McCormickDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Alicia J LozanoDepartment of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, USA.
Gabriely Del RosarioProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, USA.
Jacqueline MamaryProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, USA.
Haoyang LiuProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, USA.
Pamela FoxProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, USA.
Erin GillespieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Lior Z BraunsteinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
Dennis MahProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, USA.
Oren CahlonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; New York Proton Center, New York, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USProCure (United States) · USVirginia Tech · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeLate local recurrences and second primary breast cancers are increasingly common. Proton beam therapy (PBT) reirradiation (reRT) may allow safer delivery of a second definitive radiotherapy (RT) course. We analyzed outcomes of patients with recurrent or new primary breast cancer who underwent reRT. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn an IRB-approved retrospective study, patient/tumor characteristics, treatment parameters, outcomes, and toxicities were collected for all consecutive patients with recurrent or new primary non-metastatic breast cancer previously treated with breast or chest wall RT who underwent PBT reRT.

resultsForty-six patients received reRT using uniform (70%) or pencil beam (30%) scanning PBT. Median first RT, reRT, and cumulative doses were 60 Gy (range 45-66 Gy), 50.4 Gy(RBE) (40-66.6 Gy(RBE)), and 110 Gy(RBE) (96.6-169.4 Gy(RBE)), respectively. Median follow-up was 21 months. There were no local or regional recurrences; 17% developed distant recurrence. Two-year DMFS and OS were 92.0% and 93.6%, respectively. Nine of 13 (69.2%) patients who underwent implant or flap reconstruction developed capsular contracture, 3 (23.1%) requiring surgical intervention. One (7.7%) patient developed grade 3 breast pain requiring mastectomy after breast conserving surgery. No acute or late grade 4-5 toxicities were seen. Increased body mass index (BMI) was protective of grade ≥ 2 acute toxicity (OR = 0.84, 95%CI = 0.70-1.00).

conclusionIn the largest series to date of PBT reRT for breast cancer recurrence or new primary after prior definitive breast or chest wall RT, excellent locoregional control and few high-grade toxicities were encountered. PBT reRT may provide a relatively safe and highly effective salvage option. Additional patients and follow-up are needed to correlate composite normal tissue doses with toxicities and assess long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsProton TherapyRe-IrradiationFemaleHumansMastectomyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProtonsRetrospective StudiesProtonsBreast cancerProton therapyRadiation therapyReirradiation

Identifiers

PMID34688807
PMCPMC9554730
OpenAlexW3209818753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.