ReviewJournal of vascular surgery2021
Current status of patient-reported outcome measures in vascular surgery.
Review in Journal of vascular surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Making vascular outcomes visible: an implementation framework for an Irish national vascular registry.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Review
- Textbook outcomes for lower extremity bypass: A useful quality metric for care optimization.Journal of vascular surgery · 2026Article
- Reliability and Construct Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease.The Journal of surgical research · 2025Article
- Novel Interventions to Improve Adherence to Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Claudicants.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Self-reported outcomes following lower extremity, carotid and aortic artery disease: protocol for the Danish Vascular (DanVasc) survey.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Factors that impact the implementation of patient reported outcomes in routine clinical care for peripheral artery disease from the patient perspective.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- A patient-centered textbook outcome measure effectively discriminates contemporary elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair quality.Journal of vascular surgery · 2024Article
- A state-of-the-art review of quality-of-life assessment in venous disease.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2024Review
- Longitudinal assessment of health-related quality of life and clinical outcomes with at home advanced pneumatic compression treatment of lower extremity lymphedema.Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders · 2024Article
- Daly/Cost comparison in the management of peripheral arterial disease at 17 Belgian hospitals.BMC health services research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection.2021
Authors and funding
13 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A previously published review focused on generic and disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) relevant to vascular surgery but limited to arterial conditions. The objective of this project was to identify all available PROMs relevant to diseases treated by vascular surgeons and to evaluate vascular surgeon perceptions, barriers to widespread implementation, and concerns regarding PROMs. We provide an overview of what a PROM is and how they are developed, and summarize currently available PROMs specific to vascular surgeons. We also report results from a survey of 78 Society for Vascular Surgery members serving on committees within the Policy and Advocacy Council addressing the barriers and facilitators to using PROMs in clinical practice. Finally, we report the qualitative results of two focus groups conducted to assess granular perceptions of PROMS and preparedness of vascular surgeons for widespread implementation of PROMs. These focus groups identified a lack of awareness of existing PROMs, knowledge of how PROMs are developed and validated, and clarity around how PROMs should be used by the clinician as main subthemes for barriers to PROM implementation in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.