Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34688298›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2021

Comprehensive characterization of internal and cuticle surface microbiota of laboratory-reared F

Nsa Dada, Ana Cristina Benedict, Francisco López, Juan C Lol, Mili Sheth, Nicole Dzuris, Norma Padilla, Audrey Lenhart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Microbiota variation inMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Mosquito Gut Microbiota: A Review.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Microbiome Structure of a WildApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nsa DadaEntomology Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, United States Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. nsadada@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5276-2328
Ana Cristina BenedictGrupo de Biología Y Control de Vectores, Centro de Estudios en Salud, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Francisco LópezGrupo de Biología Y Control de Vectores, Centro de Estudios en Salud, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City, Guatemala.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4038-4777
Juan C LolGrupo de Biología Y Control de Vectores, Centro de Estudios en Salud, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City, Guatemala.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7799-9495
Mili ShethBiotechnology Core Facility Branch, Division of Scientific Resources, National Center for Emerging & Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Nicole DzurisEntomology Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, United States Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Norma PadillaGrupo de Biología Y Control de Vectores, Centro de Estudios en Salud, Universidad del Valle de Guatemala, Guatemala City, Guatemala.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4558-4444
Audrey LenhartEntomology Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, United States Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9156-4228

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch on mosquito-microbe interactions may lead to new tools for mosquito and mosquito-borne disease control. To date, such research has largely utilized laboratory-reared mosquitoes that typically lack the microbial diversity of wild populations. A logical progression in this area involves working under controlled settings using field-collected mosquitoes or, in most cases, their progeny. Thus, an understanding of how laboratory colonization affects the assemblage of mosquito microbiota would aid in advancing mosquito microbiome studies and their applications beyond laboratory settings.

methodsUsing high throughput 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, the internal and cuticle surface microbiota of F

resultsResults showed location-associated heterogeneity in both F

conclusionsThese results suggest that location-specific heterogeneity in filed mosquito microbiota can be transferred to F

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAnimalsAnimal ShellsAnophelesFemaleGuatemalaLarva16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencingAnopheles albimanusLaboratory colonizationMosquito microbiomeMosquito microbiotaNext generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID34688298
PMCPMC8542342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.