Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34688296›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Understanding multidisciplinary care for people with rheumatic disease in British Columbia, Canada, through patients, nurses and physicians voices: a qualitative policy evaluation.

Glory Apantaku, Magda Aguiar, K Julia Kaal, Sarah Munro, Michelle Teo, Mark Harrison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Glory ApantakuFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405-4625 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Magda AguiarFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405-4625 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
K Julia KaalFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405-4625 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Sarah MunroCentre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Michelle TeoBalfour Medical Clinic, Penticton, BC, Canada.
Mark HarrisonFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405-4625 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada. mark.harrison@ubc.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2011, the province of British Columbia (BC) moved to allow patients with complex rheumatic disease to be seen by nurses along with their rheumatologist by introducing a 'Multidisciplinary Care Assessments' (MCA) billing code (G31060).

objectiveTo describe multidisciplinary care introduced as part of MCAs across BC and investigate the perceived impact of this intervention, the addition of nurses to the care team, on patient care from the perspective of patients, nurses, and rheumatologists.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews, informed by a qualitative evaluation approach with patients, nurses, and rheumatologists from September 2019 - August 2020. Interviews investigated 1) the experiences of all stakeholders with adopting the multidisciplinary care billing code, 2) the perceived role of the nurse in the care team, and 3) the perceived impact of multidisciplinary care on patient experience and outcomes. We purposefully sampled practices for maximum variation of geographical location (rural vs. urban), size of practice (i.e., patient caseload), and number of nurses employed.

resultsWe interviewed 21 patients, 13 nurses, and 12 rheumatologists from across BC. Our analysis identified variation in the way rheumatologists adopted multidisciplinary care across BC. Our analysis showed some heterogeneity in the way the MCA was delivered in rheumatology practices; however, patient education was identified as the core role of nurses across practices. We identified six core themes describing the impact of this model of care, all representing improvements in the way practices functioned, from improved efficiency to access, patient experience, time management, clinician experience, and patient health outcomes. Contextual factors that influenced the presence of these themes were related to the time the nurses spent with patients and the professional roles they performed.

conclusionOur results suggest nurse care can complement physician care by extending contact time for patients and promoting the efficient use of health care professionals' skills, time, and resources. These data may encourage future uptake of the billing code to help ensure the policy delivers maximum benefits to patients given the wide range of perceived benefits described by clinicians and patients.

Indexed as

NursesPhysiciansRheumatic DiseasesBritish ColumbiaHumansPolicyQualitative ResearchCanadaFee for servicePolicyQualitative evaluationRheumatology

Identifiers

PMID34688296
PMCPMC8542329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.