Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34688291›Full record

ArticleTrials2021

The INITIATE trial protocol: a randomized controlled trial testing the effectiveness of a "quit card" intervention on long-term abstinence among tobacco smokers presenting to the emergency department.

Kerri A Mullen, Aditi Garg, Frederick Gagnon, George Wells, Atul Kapur, Steven Hawken, Andrew L Pipe, Kathryn Walker, Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy, Marta Klepaczek and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04163081 (The INITIATE Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 83% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04163081 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The INITIATE Study: Initiating Nicotine Dependence Treatment for Smokers Admitted to Emergency Departments

TypeinterventionalSponsorOttawa Heart Institute Research CorporationRan2022 to 2027Enrolled1,208ConditionsNicotine Dependence, Cigarettes, Nicotine WithdrawalArmsQuit Card Intervention (QCI)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kerri A MullenDivision of Cardiac Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4W7, Canada. kmullen@ottawaheart.ca.
Aditi GargDivision of Cardiac Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4W7, Canada.
Frederick GagnonDivision of Cardiac Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4W7, Canada.
George WellsCardiovascular Research Methods Centre, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4W7, Canada.
Atul KapurFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 75 Laurier Ave. E, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada.
Steven HawkenOttawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI), 501 Smyth Box 511, Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6, Canada.
Andrew L PipeDivision of Cardiac Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4W7, Canada.
Kathryn WalkerDivision of Cardiac Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4W7, Canada.
Venkatesh ThiruganasambandamoorthyFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 75 Laurier Ave. E, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada.
Marta KlepaczekDivision of Cardiac Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4W7, Canada.
Robert D ReidDivision of Cardiac Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4W7, Canada.
University of Ottawa · CAWilfrid Laurier University · CAInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CAOttawa Hospital Research Institute

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research PJT 162147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmoking cessation interventions implemented in emergency department (ED) settings have resulted in limited success, owing to factors such as lack of time, motivation, and incentives. A dynamic yet simple and effective approach that addresses the fast-paced nature of acute-care ED settings is needed. This study proposes a multi-center randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the effectiveness of an easy to deliver proactive, multi-component tobacco treatment intervention to usual care in the ED setting.

methodsThis will be a prospective four-site, single-blind, blinded-endpoint (PROBE) RCT. Participants will be recruited directly in the ED and will be approached strictly in order of arrival time. Those randomized to the Quit Card Intervention (QCI) group will receive a "quit kit" which will include: a "Quit Card" worth $300 that can be used at any Canadian pharmacy to purchase any form of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT); a self-help booklet; and proactive enrolment in 6 months of telephone follow-up counseling. The usual care (UC) group will receive a "quit kit" which will include a brochure for a local smoking cessation program. Quit kits for both groups will be delivered in opaque, sealed envelopes, and identical in size and weight so to conceal group allocation from the blinded research coordinator. Randomization will be stratified by site and by the Canadian Triage Acuity Scale (CTAS), a value assigned to each ED patient based on the severity of the condition. An equal number of quit kits will be prepared for each CTAS level. The primary outcome will be bio-chemically verified smoking abstinence at 26 weeks. Secondary outcomes include smoking behavior at weeks 4, 52, and 104 as well as mortality and health care utilization outcomes. Investigators, outcome assessors, and data analysts will be blinded to group allocation until after primary analyses are completed. It is hypothesized that the QCI group will have higher a abstinence rate, improved health outcomes, and decreased healthcare utilization. DISCUSSION: There are few examples of hospital EDs in Canada that systematically initiate tobacco cessation interventions for patients who smoke. Given the high smoking prevalence among ED patients and the relation of tobacco smoking to the majority of ambulatory care sensitive conditions, EDs are a missed opportunity in the initiation of tobacco treatment interventions. We have designed and will test an evidence-based tobacco treatment intervention that is simple and highly scalable.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04163081 . Registered on November 14, 2019.

Indexed as

SmokersSmoking CessationCanadaEmergency Service, HospitalHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTobacco Use Cessation DevicesTreatment OutcomeAcute careBehavioral counselingEmergency departmentHealth services researchNicotine replacement therapySmoking cessationTobacco dependence treatment

Identifiers

PMID34688291
PMCPMC8541807
OpenAlexW3208044163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.