Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34688141›Full record

ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2021

The combination of ultrasound and chlorogenic acid to inactivate Staphylococcus aureus under planktonic, biofilm, and food systems.

Jinyue Sun, Debao Wang, Zhilan Sun, Fang Liu, Lihui Du, Daoying Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Inhibitory effect ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Anti-Biofilm Activity of Chlorogenic Acid againstFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jinyue SunJiangsu Key Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety-State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Ministry of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210014, China; Institute of Agricultural Products Processing, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China.
Debao WangJiangsu Key Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety-State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Ministry of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210014, China; Institute of Agricultural Products Processing, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China.
Zhilan SunJiangsu Key Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety-State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Ministry of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210014, China; Institute of Agricultural Products Processing, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China.
Fang LiuJiangsu Key Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety-State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Ministry of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210014, China; Institute of Agricultural Products Processing, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China. Electronic address: fangliu82@163.com.
Lihui DuCollege of Food Science and Engineering, Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Grain Circulation and Safety, Key Laboratory of Grains and Oils Quality Control and Processing, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing 210023, China. Electronic address: ddabc_2000@163.com.
Daoying WangJiangsu Key Laboratory for Food Quality and Safety-State Key Laboratory Cultivation Base, Ministry of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210014, China; Institute of Agricultural Products Processing, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China.
Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNNanjing University of Finance and Economics · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the mechanism of different treatments, namely, ultrasound (US), chlorogenic acid (CA), and ultrasound combined with chlorogenic acid (US plus CA) on the inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus planktonic and biofilm cells. Results showed that the combined treatment of US and CA exhibited remarkable synergistic antibacterial and antibiofilm effects. Scanning electron microscopy images indicated that the combined treatment of US and CA caused the most serious damage to the cell morphology. Confocal laser scanning microscopy images revealed that the combined treatment led to sharp increase and severe damage to the permeability of the cell membrane, causing the release of ATP and nucleic acids and decreasing the exopolysaccharide contents in S. aureus biofilm. Finally, the combined treatment of US plus 1% CA for 60 min inactivated S. aureus cells by 1.13 lg CFU/g on mutton. Thus, the combined treatment of US and CA had synergistic effect against S. aureus under planktonic, biofilm, and food systems.

Indexed as

PlanktonStaphylococcus aureusAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiofilmsChlorogenic AcidMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChlorogenic AcidBiofilmChlorogenic acidPlanktonic cellsS. aureusUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID34688141
PMCPMC8551818
OpenAlexW3205155864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.