Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34687573›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2022

Health literacy in communication, decision-making and outcomes among cancer patients, their families and clinicians in India: A multicentre cross-sectional qualitative study.

Richard Harding, Naveen Salins, Krishna Sharan, Maria L Ekstrand

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Richard HardingCicely Saunders Institute, Department of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale School of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9653-8689
Naveen SalinsDepartment of Palliative Medicine and Supportive Care, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Krishna SharanDepartment of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Maria L EkstrandDivision of Prevention Science, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.

Funding

Stigma as a barrier to cancer palliative care outcomes among people with HIV in IndiaR21CA235808 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI EKSTRAND, MARIA L., SALINS, NAVEEN · 2018 to 2019
$326k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA235808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCancer patients in India prefer full information regarding diagnosis and prognosis, but evidence suggests poor insight. This study aimed to identify the role of health literacy among adult patients living with cancer, their families and health professionals in decision-making and treatment outcomes in India.

methodsThis cross-sectional in-depth study recruited patients, families and clinicians from three centers. Inductive thematic analysis informed a novel conceptual model.

resultsWe recruited n = 34 cancer patients, n = 33 family members, n = 11 doctors and n = 14 nurses (N = 92). Principle emergent themes were the following: (1) Preferences and dynamics of diagnosis and prognosis disclosure, for example, the dominant preference was for families who held hope for cure to discourage disclosure; clinicians sometimes disclosed in line with perceived ability to pay for treatment. (2) Understanding of disease and its treatment options (etiology, potential trajectory, treatment options), for example, lay understandings of cancer etiology as contamination from outside the home, and reluctance of patients to ask questions of clinicians. (3) Priorities in decision-making, for example, not engaging patients due to fear of patient distress, patients initiated on anticancer treatments without knowledge or consent, pursuing futile treatments. (4) Anxieties over finances and outcomes (disclosure, decision-making, care pathways), for example, clinicians attempting to reduce families pursuing expensive and inappropriate treatment options with patients who have poor insight, catastrophic spending based on poor decisions.

conclusionThe novel evidence-based health literacy model offers potential for feasible and acceptable intervention to support families in communication, disclosure and decision-making. This may improve patients' access to informed, appropriate care pathways.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyNeoplasmsAdultCommunicationCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingHumansIndiacancercommunicationdecision-makinghealth literacyIndiainformationoncology

Identifiers

PMID34687573
PMCPMC10505478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.