Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34687542›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2022

Breast cancer risk in residents of Belarus exposed to Chernobyl fallout while pregnant or lactating: standardized incidence ratio analysis, 1997 to 2016.

Elizabeth K Cahoon, Dale Preston, Rui Zhang, Vibha Vij, Mark P Little, Kiyohiko Mabuchi, Vladimir Drozdovitch, Konstantin Chizhov, Vasilina V Yauseyenka, Alexander V Rozhko and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Doses from external irradiation and ingestion ofRadiation and environmental biophysics · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth K CahoonDivision of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8028-0588
Dale PrestonHirosoft International, Eureka, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0641-2925
Rui ZhangDivision of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Vibha VijDivision of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Mark P LittleDivision of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0980-7567
Kiyohiko MabuchiDivision of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Vladimir DrozdovitchDivision of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7952-379X
Konstantin ChizhovDivision of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Vasilina V YauseyenkaRepublican Research Center for Radiation Medicine and Human Ecology, Gomel, Belarus.
Alexander V RozhkoRepublican Research Center for Radiation Medicine and Human Ecology, Gomel, Belarus.
Ilya V VelalkinRepublican Research Center for Radiation Medicine and Human Ecology, Gomel, Belarus.
National Cancer Institute · USRepublican Research Center for Radiation Medicine and Human Ecology · BY

Funding

Studies of Populations Exposed to Environmental Sources of RadiationZIACP010132 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI CAHOON, ELIZABETH · 2009 to 2025
$35.2M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnancy and lactation may constitute radiation-sensitive reproductive periods due to rapid cell proliferation and concentration of radioiodine in the lactating breast. However, there are limited epidemiological data among women exposed to radiation during these periods.

methodsWe examined incidence of breast cancer in a cohort of 3214 women who were pregnant and/or lactating within 2 months (26 April to 30 June 1986) of the Chernobyl accident and residing in contaminated regions of Belarus. There were 33 breast cancers identified through linkage with the Belarusian National Cancer Registry. Breast cancer rates among women who were either pregnant and/or lactating were compared with population rates by calculating standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) adjusting for attained age, oblast, urban/rural residence and calendar year.

resultsAmong women who were lactating, we found a greater than 2-fold increased risk of breast cancer compared with the general population, SIR = 2.49 (95% CI: 1.55, 3.75). In contrast, women who were pregnant were not at increased risk (SIR = 0.84 95% CI: 0.46, 1.38). The SIR was highest in women who were exposed at a younger age and at the earliest time period since the accident, though stratified analyses had limited sample sizes.

conclusionsWe found a significantly increased risk of breast cancer among women residing in contaminated areas of Belarus who were lactating at the time of the accident and may have had elevated exposure to radioiodine, when compared with the general population. Studies of breast cancer with individual radiation dose estimates among women exposed during lactation are warranted.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsChernobyl Nuclear AccidentNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedFemaleHumansIncidenceIodine RadioisotopesLactationPregnancyRepublic of BelarusIodine Radioisotopes131IBreast cancerbreastfeedingChernobyliodinelactationpregnancyradiation

Identifiers

PMID34687542
PMCPMC9082790
OpenAlexW3210471251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.