Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34687426›Full record

Observational studyInfection2021

Evaluation of a multiplex PCR screening approach to identify community-acquired bacterial co-infections in COVID-19: a multicenter prospective cohort study of the German competence network of community-acquired pneumonia (CAPNETZ).

Kathrin Rothe, Christoph D Spinner, Marcus Panning, Mathias W Pletz, Gernot Rohde, Jan Rupp, Martin Witzenrath, Johanna Erber, Frank Eberhardt, Andreas Essig and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Infection, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Can Digital PCR Enhance the Detection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. SARS-CoV-2 andFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) associated bacterial coinfection: Incidence, diagnosis and treatment.Journal of microbiology, immunology, and infection = Wei mian yu gan ran za zhi · 2022
    Review
  13. Legionnaires' Disease: Update on Diagnosis and Treatment.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Kathrin RotheSchool of Medicine, Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Christoph D SpinnerDepartment of Internal Medicine II, School of Medicine, University Hospital rechts der isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Marcus PanningFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Virology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Mathias W PletzInstitute of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital/Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Gernot RohdeDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Medical Clinic I, Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
Jan RuppDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Martin WitzenrathDivision of Pulmonary Inflammation, Department of Infectious Diseases and Pulmonary Medicine, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Johanna ErberDepartment of Internal Medicine II, School of Medicine, University Hospital rechts der isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Frank EberhardtCAPNETZ STIFTUNG, Hannover, Germany.
Andreas EssigDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Jochen SchneiderDepartment of Internal Medicine II, School of Medicine, University Hospital rechts der isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. Jochen.schneider@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0300-0159
Members of the CAPNETZ study group
TUM Klinikum · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DEUniversität Ulm · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene · DEJena University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThorough knowledge of the nature and frequency of co-infections is essential to optimize treatment strategies and risk assessment in cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to evaluate the multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) screening approach for community-acquired bacterial pathogens (CABPs) at hospital admission, which could facilitate identification of bacterial co-infections in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

methodsClinical data and biomaterials from 200 hospitalized COVID-19 patients from the observational cohort of the Competence Network for community-acquired pneumonia (CAPNETZ) prospectively recruited between March 17, 2020, and March 12, 2021 in 12 centers in Germany and Switzerland, were included in this study. Nasopharyngeal swab samples were analyzed on hospital admission using multiplex real-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR for a broad range of CABPs.

resultsIn total of 200 patients Staphylococcus aureus (27.0%), Haemophilus influenzae (13.5%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (5.5%), Moraxella catarrhalis (2.5%), and Legionella pneumophila (1.5%) were the most frequently detected bacterial pathogens. PCR detection of bacterial pathogens correlated with purulent sputum, and showed no correlation with ICU admission, mortality, and inflammation markers. Although patients who received antimicrobial treatment were more often admitted to the ICU and had a higher mortality rate, PCR pathogen detection was not significantly related to antimicrobial treatment.

conclusionGeneral CABP screening using multiplex PCR with nasopharyngeal swabs may not facilitate prediction or identification of bacterial co-infections in the early phase of COVID-19-related hospitalization. Most patients with positive PCR results appear to be colonized rather than infected at that time, questioning the value of routine antibiotic treatment on admission in COVID-19 patients.

Indexed as

CoinfectionCommunity-Acquired InfectionsCOVID-19Legionella pneumophilaPneumoniaCohort StudiesHumansMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Antibiotic stewardshipBacterial pathogensCommunity-acquired co-infectionCOVID-19Rapid multiplex PCR diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID34687426
PMCPMC8536912
OpenAlexW3207607380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.