Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34687392›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2021

Comprehensive overview of extracellular vesicle proteomics in meningioma: future strategy.

Rashmi Rana, Swati Sharma, Nirmal Kumar Ganguly

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Innovation in Non-Invasive Diagnosis and Disease Monitoring for Meningiomas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rashmi RanaDepartment of Research, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, 110060, India. rashmi.rana@sgrh.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0071-089X
Swati SharmaDepartment of Research, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, 110060, India.
Nirmal Kumar GangulyDepartment of Research, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, 110060, India.
Sir Ganga Ram Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeningioma arising from meninges is one among the various types of brain tumors. Others are, astrocytomas originating from astrocyte, oligodendrogliomas originating from oligodendrocyte, Ependymomas originating from ependymal cells and medulloblastomas originating from neurons. Current knowledge of molecular biology, genetics and epigenetics of meningioma is not sufficient. Therefore, In depth understanding of the mechanism of meningioma formation and progression is needed for its treatment and management. Grade I Grade I meningiomas are majorly classified as grade I, grade II and grade III. Meningioma can be indolent, slow growing or can be invasive and metastatic which can recurre. Grade I meningioma can be removed by surgery in comparison to invasive meningioma which may recurre with high propensity. This property of recurrence is responsible for high morbidity and mortality. Meningioma are majorly classified into three classes namely grade I, grade II, grade III. Protein biomarkers are considered as promising candidates for the diagnosis of meningioma. STUDY: Various studies done on differential expression of proteins have shown increased expression of EGFR, NEK9, EPS812, CKAP4, SET and STAT2, in all the three grades of meningioma. Additionally, some proteins like HK2 are overexpressed in grade II and grade III meningioma than in grade I meningioma. Protein Markers, found on extracellular vesicles of different grades of meningioma can serve the same purpose. A test done on a sample of any kind of body fluid like blood, tear, saliva, urine etc. for recognizing the circulating cancer cells or DNA and extracellular vesicles released from them to help detecting the early stage of cancer is known as liquid biopsy. Solid biopsy has several limitations as compared to liquid biopsy. This is because the samples can be easily collected and studied in case of liquid biopsy. Exosomes are related with liquid biopsy and hence provide platform for better diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of any type of cancer including meningioma. Exosomal tetraspanin are important example of exosomal biomarkers. The tetraspanin network is a molecular scaffold which connects various proteins for signal transduction.

conclusionThis study tells about the utility of proper knowledge of extracellular vesicle proteins and their profiles in different grades, which can help in better understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of meningioma. In Addition to use of these proteins as biomarkers, role of exosomes in currently available therapeutic approaches has been discussed.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsDrug Delivery SystemsExosomesExtracellular VesiclesHumansLiquid BiopsyMeningiomaNeoplasm GradingPrognosisProteomicsTetraspaninsBiomarkers, TumorTetraspaninsDrug delivery vehiclesExosomes biomarkersExtracellular vesiclesMeningiomaProteomicsTherapeuticsVaccines

Identifiers

PMID34687392
PMCPMC8536918
OpenAlexW3206334006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.