Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34687378›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2022

The Natural Swallow: Factors Affecting Subject Choice of Bolus Volume and Pharyngeal Swallow Parameters in a Self-selected Swallow.

Sophia M Colevas, Lily N Stalter, Corinne A Jones, Timothy M McCulloch

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Thin Liquid Sip Sizes in Outpatient Adults with Normal and Disordered Swallowing: Modifying Factors and Relationships with Swallowing Safety and Efficiency.Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics (IALP) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sophia M ColevasDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue Rm K4/712 CSC, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3242-1590
Lily N StalterDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI, USA.
Corinne A JonesDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue Rm K4/712 CSC, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.
Timothy M McCullochDivision of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Avenue Rm K4/712 CSC, Madison, WI, 53792, USA. mccull@surgery.wisc.edu.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of Wisconsin System · US

Funding

NEUROSCIENCE TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007507 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HALLORAN, MARY C · 1985 to 2017
$9.3M
High Resolution Manometry: A Novel Pattern Recognition Method for DysphagiaR21DC011130 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MCCULLOCH, TIMOTHY M · 2011 to 2012
$398k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC011130NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predetermined volumes are used extensively throughout clinical assessment of swallowing physiology, but bolus volumes selected by an individual in their natural swallow can vary greatly from those used in structured assessment. This study aims to identify factors influencing self-selected volume and how the mechanics of self-selected volume swallows differ from predetermined volume swallows. We used pharyngeal high-resolution manometry (HRM) with simultaneous videofluoroscopy to measure swallowing pressures in the velopharynx, hypopharynx, and upper esophageal sphincter (UES). Data were collected from 95 healthy adults during thin liquid swallows of 10 mL and a self-selected comfortable volume. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to analyze within-subject self-selected volume reliability. Linear mixed effects regression models were used to examine the association of subject characteristics with self-selected swallow volume and of self-selected volumes on pharyngeal swallowing pressures and timing events. Mean self-selected volume was 16.66 ± 7.70 mL. Increased age (p = 0.002), male sex (p = 0.021), and increased pharyngeal hold area (p = 0.007) were significantly associated with increase in self-selected bolus volume. There was good reliability between subjects' individual swallow volumes (ICC = 0.80). Velopharyngeal maximum pressure and pressure integral, tongue base duration and maximum pressure, UES pre- and post-swallow maximum pressure, and overall pharyngeal contractile integral decreased significantly with self-selected boluses. Understanding a patient's natural swallow volume, and how their natural swallow functions, will be important for designing clinical evaluations that place stress on the patient's natural swallowing mechanics in order to assess for areas of dysfunction.

Indexed as

Esophageal Sphincter, UpperPharynxAdultDeglutitionHumansMaleManometryPressureReproducibility of ResultsBolus volumeDeglutitionDeglutition disordersHigh-resolution manometryPharyngeal pressureSwallowing physiology

Identifiers

PMID34687378
PMCPMC10202029
OpenAlexW3207191472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.