Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34687375›Full record

ReviewApoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death2021

Regulation of autophagy as a therapeutic option in glioblastoma.

Amanda J Manea, Swapan K Ray

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Rising impact of cell death research.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Programmed cell death lives.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amanda J ManeaDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, 6439 Garners Ferry Road, Columbia, SC, 29209, USA.
Swapan K RayDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, 6439 Garners Ferry Road, Columbia, SC, 29209, USA. swapan.ray@uscmed.sc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1734-542X
University of South Carolina · US

Funding

DIFFERENTIATION AND APOPTOSIS IN MALIGNANT NEUROBLASTOMAR01NS057811 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI RAY, SWAPAN K. · 2006 to 2009
$1.3M
PROTEOLYTIC CONTROL OF GLIOBLASTOMAR01CA091460 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI RAY, SWAPAN K · 2003 to 2007
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS CA-091460NCI NIH HHS R01 CA091460NINDS NIH HHS NS-057811NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS057811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Around three out of one hundred thousand people are diagnosed with glioblastoma multiforme, simply called glioblastoma, which is the most common primary brain tumor in adults. With a dismal prognosis of a little over a year, receiving a glioblastoma diagnosis is oftentimes fatal. A major advancement in its treatment was made almost two decades ago when the alkylating chemotherapeutic agent temozolomide (TMZ) was combined with radiotherapy (RT). Little progress has been made since then. Therapies that focus on the modulation of autophagy, a key process that regulates cellular homeostasis, have been developed to curb the progression of glioblastoma. The dual role of autophagy (cell survival or cell death) in glioblastoma has led to the development of autophagy inhibitors and promoters that either work as monotherapies or as part of a combination therapy to induce cell death, cellular senescence, and counteract the ability of glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) for initiating tumor recurrence. The myriad of cellular pathways that act upon the modulation of autophagy have created contention between two groups: those who use autophagy inhibition versus those who use promotion of autophagy to control glioblastoma growth. We discuss rationale for using current major therapeutics, their molecular mechanisms for modulation of autophagy in glioblastoma and GSCs, their potentials for making strides in combating glioblastoma progression, and their possible shortcomings. These shortcomings may fuel the innovation of novel delivery systems and therapies involving TMZ in conjunction with another agent to pave the way towards a new gold standard of glioblastoma treatment.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingApoptosisAutophagyCell Line, TumorHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingApoptosisAutophagy inhibitionAutophagy promotionCombination therapy optionGlioblastomaMonotherapy option

Identifiers

PMID34687375
OpenAlexW3206505563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.