Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34687352›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology2022

Fatty acid profiles of feeding and fasting bears: estimating calibration coefficients, the timeframe of diet estimates, and selective mobilization during hibernation.

Gregory W Thiemann, Karyn D Rode, Joy A Erlenbach, Suzanne M Budge, Charles T Robbins

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gregory W ThiemannFaculty of Environmental and Urban Change, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada. thiemann@yorku.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-1888-900X
Karyn D RodeUS Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center, Anchorage, AK, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3328-8202
Joy A ErlenbachSchool of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0347-3711
Suzanne M BudgeProcess Engineering and Applied Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4984-7344
Charles T RobbinsSchool of the Environment and School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1207-7745

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate information on diet composition is central to understanding and conserving carnivore populations. Quantitative fatty acid signature analysis (QFASA) has emerged as a powerful tool for estimating the diets of predators, but ambiguities remain about the timeframe of QFASA estimates and the need to account for species-specific patterns of metabolism. We conducted a series of feeding experiments with four juvenile male brown bears (Ursus arctos) to (1) track the timing of changes in adipose tissue composition and QFASA diet estimates in response to a change in diet and (2) quantify the relationship between consumer and diet FA composition (i.e., determine "calibration coefficients"). Bears were fed three compositionally distinct diets for 90-120 days each. Two marine-based diets were intended to approximate the lipid content and composition of the wild diet of polar bears (U. maritimus). Bear adipose tissue composition changed quickly in the direction of the diet and showed evidence of stabilization after 60 days. During hibernation, FA profiles were initially stable but diet estimates after 10 weeks were sensitive to calibration coefficients. Calibration coefficients derived from the marine-based diets were broadly similar to each other and to published values from marine-fed mink (Mustela vison), which have been used as a model for free-ranging polar bears. For growing bears on a high-fat diet, the temporal window for QFASA estimates was 30-90 days. Although our results reinforce the importance of accurate calibration, the similarities across taxa and diets suggest it may be feasible to develop a generalized QFASA approach for mammalian carnivores.

Indexed as

HibernationUrsidaeAnimalsCalibrationDietFastingFatty AcidsMaleFatty AcidsBrown bearForaging ecologyHibernationPolar bearQFASA

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.