Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34687349›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2021

Insight into Bacterial Community Responses to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and the Degradation Potentials of Three Bacterial Isolates in Seagrass Halophila ovalis Sediments.

Manzoor Ahmad, Juan Ling, Qingsong Yang, Wasim Sajjad, Weiguo Zhou, Jianping Yin, Junde Dong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impacts of pollution on the soil microbiome.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Assessing hydrocarbon degradation capacity ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Manzoor AhmadCAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-Resources and Ecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Marine Biology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510301, China.
Juan LingCAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-Resources and Ecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Marine Biology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510301, China. lingjuan@scsio.ac.cn.
Qingsong YangCAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-Resources and Ecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Marine Biology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510301, China.
Wasim SajjadDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, 46000, Pakistan.
Weiguo ZhouCAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-Resources and Ecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Marine Biology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510301, China.
Jianping YinCAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-Resources and Ecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Marine Biology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510301, China.
Junde DongCAS Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-Resources and Ecology, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Marine Biology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, 510301, China. dongjunde@vip.163.com.
South China Sea Institute Of Oceanology · CNSouthern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou) · CNInstitute of Oceanology · CNNational University of Medical Sciences · PKUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

Guangdong Key Laboratory of Innovation Method and Decision Management System (CN) GML2019ZD0402Guangdong Province Public Welfare Research and Capacity Building Project 2015A020216016Innovation Academy of South China Sea Ecology and Environmental Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences ISEE2018ZD02National Key Research and Development Program of China 2017YFC0506301National Key Research and Development Program of China 2018FY100105National Key Research and Development Program of China 2018YFC1406501National Natural Science Foundation of China 41406191National Natural Science Foundation of China 41676163National Natural Science Foundation of China 41976147Pearl River S&T Nova Program of Guangzhou 201806010017Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China 2017B030314052Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences XDA13020300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seagrass meadows constitute a prestigious ecosystem in the marine environment, providing valuable ecological and commercial services. Among the various causes, pollutions are considered one of the significant reasons for seagrass decline globally. This study investigates the impacts of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons mixture (pyrene, phenanthrene, and fluorene) on bacterial communities in Halophila ovalis sediments. The seagrass sediment bacterial microbiome was evaluated in a batch culture experiment by Illumina MiSeq sequencing. Culture-able bacterial strains were isolated and characterized by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The results demonstrated an excellent alpha diversity in the original sediments with a Shannon index of (8.078) compared to the subsequent control group (5.908) and PAH-treated group (PAH-T) (4.916). Three phyla, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Bacteroidetes, were detected in high abundance in the control and PAH-T groups. However, a significant difference (P < 0.05) was observed at the genus level between control and PAH-T group bacterial consortia. Pseudomonas, Mycobacterium, Idiomarina, Hydrogenophaga, Alteromonas, Sphingobacterium, and several others were highly abundant in PAH-T groups. Most of the culture-able isolates recovered in this study showed the closest resemblance to previously identified hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria. Among the three strains, Mix-16 (Citricoccus yambaruensis) and Mix-20 (Gordonia rubripertincta) showed a higher degradation of PAHs than Mix-19 (Isoptericola halotolerans) in the monoculture experiment. The most increased degradation of PAHs was recorded in the co-culture experiment. The present work revealed that PAHs could act as environmental stress and can influence bacterial community succession. Moreover, the co-culture strategy significantly enhanced the biodegradation of PAHs.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsActinobacteriaBacteriaBiodegradation, EnvironmentalGeologic SedimentsMicrococcaceaeRNA, Ribosomal, 16SPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID34687349
OpenAlexW3206187218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.