Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34687238›Full record

ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2022

Retinal defocus in myopes wearing dual-focus zonal contact lenses.

Neeraj K Singh, Dawn Meyer, Matt Jaskulski, Pete Kollbaum

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Accommodative behaviour and retinal defocus of children during prolonged viewing of electronic devices while wearing dual-focus myopia control soft contact lenses.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  4. IMI-Instrumentation for Myopia Management.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Review
  5. Accommodative behaviour and retinal defocus in highly myopic eyes fitted with a dual focus myopia control contact lens.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Retinal defocus in myopes wearing dual-focus zonal contact lenses.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neeraj K SinghSchool of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3424-3492
Dawn MeyerSchool of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5157-2557
Matt JaskulskiSchool of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5824-7135
Pete KollbaumSchool of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9568-2064
Indiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the refractive impact of dual-focus (DF) myopia control contact lenses (CLs) on accommodating young myopic adults.

methodsPhase 1: accommodative accuracy was assessed in 40 myopic participants. Phase 2: a subset of four subjects who demonstrated accurate accommodation and six who chronically underaccommodated were fitted with single vision (SV, Proclear 1 day) and centre-distance DF myopia control CLs (MiSight 1 day) with approximately +2.00 D of additional power in two surrounding annular zones. While binocularly viewing high contrast characters at 4.00, 1.00, 0.50, 0.33, 0.25 and 0.20 m, aberrometry data were captured across the central ±30° of the horizontal retina. Local refractive errors were pooled for each area of the pupil covered by the central distance or first annular defocus zone of the DF CLs.

resultsIn the "good" accommodator group fitted with SV CLs, accommodative lags were generally absent except at the closest viewing distance (mean errors: -0.09 ± 0.22 D, -0.12 ± 0.26 D, -0.05 ± 0.37 D and +0.38 ± 0.54 D for -2.00, -3.00, -4.00 and -5.00 D target vergences, respectively) but significantly larger in the "poor" accommodating participants (+0.81 ± 0.21 D, +0.97 ± 0.27 D, +1.18 ± 0.39 D, +1.47 ± 0.55 D). For most viewing distances, hyperopic defocus observed in the region of the pupil covered by the first annular zone was replaced with myopic defocus when fitted with the DF CLs. Myopic defocus created by the first annular region was present across the central 30° of the retina.

conclusionsSome young adult myopes chronically experience high levels of hyperopic defocus when viewing near targets, which was replaced by myopic defocus in the annular part of the pupil covered by the treatment zones when fitted with a centre-distance myopia control DF CL.

Indexed as

Contact LensesMyopiaAccommodation, OcularHumansRefraction, OcularRetinaYoung Adultaccommodationcontact lensesdual-focusmyopiaoptical aberrationsperipheral refractionretinal defocus

Identifiers

PMID34687238
PMCPMC9298321
OpenAlexW3205828224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.