Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34687078›Full record

ArticlePublic health nursing (Boston, Mass.)2022

Exploring nurses' online perspectives and social networks during a global pandemic COVID-19.

Lisa O'Leary, Sonja Erikainen, Laura-Maria Peltonen, Wasim Ahmed, Mike Thelwall, Siobhan O'Connor

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Self-care practices among professional nurses employed in primary health care clinics.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2024
    Article
  4. Sentiment and emotion trends in nurses' tweets about the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Lisa O'LearySchool of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7131-2920
Sonja ErikainenCentre for Biomedicine, Self and Society, Usher Institute, The Edinburgh of University, Edinburgh, UK.
Laura-Maria PeltonenDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Wasim AhmedBusiness School, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Mike ThelwallFaculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK.
Siobhan O'ConnorSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-8579-1718
Edinburgh Napier University · GBOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IERoyal Society of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Stirling · GBUniversity of Turku · FIUniversity of Wolverhampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesExamine the online interactions, social networks, and perspectives of nursing actors on COVID-19 from conversations on Twitter to understand how the profession responded to this global pandemic.

designMixed methods. SAMPLE: Ten-thousand five-hundred and seventy-four tweets by 2790 individuals and organizations. MEASUREMENTS: NodeXL software was used for social network analysis to produce a network visualization. The betweenness centrality algorithm identified key users who were influential in COVID-19 related conversations on Twitter. Inductive content analysis enabled exploration of tweet content. A communicative figurations framework guided the study.

resultsNursing actors formed different social groupings, and communicated with one another across groups. Tweets covered four themes; (1) outbreak and clinical management of the infectious disease, (2) education and information sharing, (3) social, economic, and political context, and (4) working together and supporting each other.

conclusionIn addition to spreading knowledge, nurses tried to reach out through social media to political and healthcare leaders to advocate for improvements needed to address COVID-19. However, they primarily conversed within their own professional community. Action is needed to better understand how social media is and can be used by nurses for health communication, and to improve their preparedness to be influential on social media beyond the nursing community.

Indexed as

COVID-19NursesSocial MediaHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Social Networkingcommunicable diseasescoronavirusCOVID-19infectious diseasenursingpandemicssocial mediaTwitter

Identifiers

PMID34687078
PMCPMC8661865
OpenAlexW3202136331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.