Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34687040›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2022

A Quantitative Modeling and Simulation Framework to Support Candidate and Dose Selection of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Monoclonal Antibodies to Advance Bamlanivimab Into a First-in-Human Clinical Trial.

Emmanuel Chigutsa, Eric Jordie, Matthew Riggs, Ajay Nirula, Ahmed Elmokadem, Tim Knab, Jenny Y Chien

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04411628 (A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Sponsor Unblinded, Single Ascending Dose, Phase 1 First in Human Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Intravenous LY3819253 in Participants Hospitalized for COVID-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04411628 phase1completednot on this map

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Sponsor Unblinded, Single Ascending Dose, Phase 1 First in Human Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Intravenous LY3819253 in Participants Hospitalized for COVID-19

TypeinterventionalSponsorEli Lilly and CompanyRan2020 to 2020Enrolled26ConditionsCOVID-19ArmsLY3819253, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Model-informed drug discovery and development approaches to inform clinical trial design and regulatory decisions: A primer for the MENA region.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Update on COVID-19 Therapy in Pediatric Age.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emmanuel ChigutsaEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Eric JordieMetrum Research Group, Inc., Tariffville, Connecticut, USA.
Matthew RiggsMetrum Research Group, Inc., Tariffville, Connecticut, USA.
Ajay NirulaEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Ahmed ElmokademMetrum Research Group, Inc., Tariffville, Connecticut, USA.
Tim KnabMetrum Research Group, Inc., Tariffville, Connecticut, USA.
Jenny Y ChienEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Metrum Research Group (United States) · USEli Lilly (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (mAb), novel therapeutics for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), have been urgently researched from the start of the pandemic. The selection of the optimal mAb candidate and therapeutic dose were expedited using open-access in silico models. The maximally effective therapeutic mAb dose was determined through two approaches; both expanded on innovative, open-science initiatives. A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model, incorporating physicochemical properties predictive of mAb clearance and tissue distribution, was used to estimate mAb exposure that maintained concentrations above 90% inhibitory concentration of in vitro neutralization in lung tissue for up to 4 weeks in 90% of patients. To achieve fastest viral clearance following onset of symptoms, a longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 viral dynamic model was applied to estimate viral clearance as a function of drug concentration and dose. The PBPK model-based approach suggested that a clinical dose between 175 and 500 mg of bamlanivimab would maintain target mAb concentrations in the lung tissue over 28 days in 90% of patients. The viral dynamic model suggested a 700 mg dose would achieve maximum viral elimination. Taken together, the first-in-human trial (NCT04411628) conservatively proceeded with a starting therapeutic dose of 700 mg and escalated to higher doses to evaluate the upper limit of safety and tolerability. Availability of open-access codes and application of novel in silico model-based approaches supported the selection of bamlanivimab and identified the lowest dose evaluated in this study that was expected to result in the maximum therapeutic effect before the first-in-human clinical trial.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntiviral AgentsClinical Trials as TopicComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDose-Response Relationship, ImmunologicHumansSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntiviral Agentsbamlanivimab

Identifiers

PMID34687040
PMCPMC8653169
OpenAlexW3205716711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.